We performed a comparison between Informatica Axon and MANTA Flow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance."Some of Axon's valuable features include creating your business glossaries, importing DQ rules, and creating change management."
"The best thing about Informatica Axon is that it integrates with the Electronic Data Capture and the Axon system."
"It is a very stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The tool's most valuable feature is bulk upload. We upload files in CSV or Excel format."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Axon is features, interfaces, and data mapping. It represents clusters nicely."
"The solution allows the complete governance process, starting from the data quality, those definitions, and it can get the data quality in the EDC."
"The product is stable."
"Axon has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has, so they can request access. That's one feature we use extensively. Axon also offers great visibility and intuitive searchability, allowing you to easily search data assets. You can check the lineage and see the work EDC does. EDC handles all the classification, cataloging, and lineage. It's integrated with Axon, and anyone can see that."
"The solution is stable. We have not found any fatal errors yet."
"I believe it is very powerful. And for technicians, you can see the impact analysis, you can compare versions. So you can see some revisions against some of the oldest ones. You can compare and see which pipelines were updated between them. I think it is very helpful to both sides, the technical and business teams."
"The solution should improve its integration."
"There is room for improvement in the support. The response time could be faster."
"I would like to have the solution in one product and technical support needs to be better."
"Informatica Axon needs to improve its interface."
"There are some limitations with Informatica Axon when one tries to connect or integrate it with Jira."
"It is complicated to establish the lineage in EDC using PowerCenter mappings."
"Right now, although they offer some templates, I would want more templates available to be imported."
"Some functionalities can be a challenge in the cloud."
"One area of improvement for MANTA Flow is to add as many new data sources as possible. We have found that maybe they can support 100, but not 101, unfortunately."
"I would like to have some kind of API where I could call this object and the revision that I want and the same object and another revision that I wanted to compare with. And I could not see it as some API in MANTA Flow, and we have this feature on the user interface."
Informatica Axon is ranked 3rd in Data Governance with 23 reviews while MANTA Flow is ranked 19th in Data Governance with 2 reviews. Informatica Axon is rated 7.8, while MANTA Flow is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Informatica Axon writes "It has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MANTA Flow writes "Very Powerful, with cloud based scalability, and highly efficient for both business and technical teams". Informatica Axon is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, BigID and erwin Data Intelligence by Quest, whereas MANTA Flow is most compared with Collibra Lineage, Microsoft Purview Data Governance and Alation Data Catalog.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.