We performed a comparison between Informatica Address Verification and Melissa Data Quality based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Quality solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The scalability is very high."
"We mainly communicate with our customers via email, so we primarily use it to find a phone number so we can contact them more efficiently. This allows us to talk to them and resolve their issues much more quickly."
"We ran a standard name, address, and zip code, internal dedupe between the different files we had purchased, and we were able to quickly notify our vendor that they had tens of thousands of duplications that they were not even aware of."
"Getting the most up to date address for our members. We like to keep in touch with membership a few times a year so we want to maintain up to date addresses to be sure they receive any information that we mail to them."
"Address parsing. Our other software does not have this functionality."
"We use their GeoPoints to get the most precise, rooftop level geocoding."
"Standardizing allows me to more effectively check for duplicate/existing records. Verifying increases the value of the data."
"The customers' addresses are now complete, correct and follow one consistent format."
"Ability to keep our data set clean and usable for our community searches."
"The only thing that I can imagine that might be improved is how the available transactions verify addresses used. These transactions have a valid end date and must be used within the agreed timeframe."
"We have noticed that some of the emails and addresses return with confusing or incorrect codes, but for the most part, it is accurate."
"We encounter failed batch processes once in a while, but their team is quick to rectify issues."
"More countries should be supported by Melissa."
"Needs to validate more addresses accurately."
"The tool needs to provide resizable forms/windows like all other SSIS windows. Vendor claims its an SSIS limitation however all SSIS components are resizable so that isn't true. This is just an annoyance but needless."
"Speed of delivery/ease of use. They advertise a 24-hour, next business day turn time on data annotation, but I’ve found it is usually closer to 72 hours. This is still excellent, just make sure you add in the appropriate fluff to your delivery timelines."
"Did not work as advertized. Needs better results in address parsing, as described on the website."
"Address validation and parsing in a few countries have room for improvement."
Informatica Address Verification is ranked 12th in Data Quality while Melissa Data Quality is ranked 9th in Data Quality with 40 reviews. Informatica Address Verification is rated 8.4, while Melissa Data Quality is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Informatica Address Verification writes "Scalable, ensures proper data governance, and is easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Melissa Data Quality writes "SSIS MatchUp Component is Amazing". Informatica Address Verification is most compared with Trillium TS Quality, Ataccama DQ Analyzer, Posidex Technologies Data Quality and SAP Data Quality Management, whereas Melissa Data Quality is most compared with SAP Data Quality Management, Precisely Trillium and Experian Data Quality. See our Informatica Address Verification vs. Melissa Data Quality report.
See our list of best Data Quality vendors.
We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
