We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and Oracle Enterprise Asset Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Oracle and others in Enterprise Asset Management."The most powerful features are the database and integration with CMDB."
"It is configurable, where you can add extra fields to screens and to the database."
"We are very thankful to have IBM integrated with our own Legacy cloud-based system"
"It can be particularly useful for power line operations, enabling linemen in the field to gather information and send it across the country as well as different parts of the world."
"I have found Work Order management the most valuable feature. Additionally, it is a very robust and powerful solution."
"Its capabilities let us organize our work."
"The large range of configurability of the product is great, since everyone has a different way of doing things."
"There are not many enterprise asset management systems on the market and not many that have the categories that IBM Maximo has."
"The whole product is important and valuable to us."
"Areas for improvement would be the user interface and support for Arabic. They could also be more customer-oriented."
"The interface is not very easy or user-friendly and is in need of improvement."
"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is easy and one is difficult, I rate the setup process a two since it is very complicated."
"The mobile solution has a lot of room for improvement, especially in geopositioning capabilities, tracking capabilities, and configuration capabilities, in order to let the tech operate online and offline."
"Areas for improvement include: an enhanced Service Catalog on Mobile; Agent intelligence; better dashboards for KPIs."
"It's not user-friendly. It could use shortcuts for frequently requested services."
"Initial setup is a longer process because Maximo is bigger and has more processes."
"Coding can be complex when customization is required."
"The product is not user-friendly."
More Oracle Enterprise Asset Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management with 23 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Asset Management with 1 review. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Asset Management writes "The product is not user-friendly, and it is very expensive, though it is highly stable". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM, IFS Cloud Platform and Coupa Invoice, whereas Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is most compared with ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM and Infor CloudSuite EAM.
See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.