We performed a comparison between IBM Data Governance and Informatica Axon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance."IBM Data Governance improved data analytics operations. During a company merger, we used IBM Data Governance to understand and bridge sample data between systems."
"The solution offers good data governance."
"It is a very stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Able to customize data search and data sharing."
"The solution allows the complete governance process, starting from the data quality, those definitions, and it can get the data quality in the EDC."
"Axon has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has, so they can request access. That's one feature we use extensively. Axon also offers great visibility and intuitive searchability, allowing you to easily search data assets. You can check the lineage and see the work EDC does. EDC handles all the classification, cataloging, and lineage. It's integrated with Axon, and anyone can see that."
"The features for data quality, data cataloging, and UI are excellent."
"The dictionary, the search, and the ratings are without a doubt the most beneficial components of this solution."
"It's helpful in integration, and it can be moved around in SharePoint. So, from the SharePoint View, data integration and reporting, it help a lot in that way."
"One area with room for improvement would be the ability to generate detailed quality reports. Some Python libraries provide quality scores and reports—having that capability within IBM Data Governance would be beneficial."
"The on-prem version's functionalities may not be available on the cloud version."
"The solution should improve its integration."
"The stability and the integration of the solution have room for improvement."
"The main issue probably has nothing to do with end users, but installation can definitely be simplified."
"The solution still is a bit manual in its functionality. We want t to be more automation-driven."
"Informatica Axon's response times and certain aspects of the admin panel could be enhanced for better usability."
"It is complicated to establish the lineage in EDC using PowerCenter mappings."
"I would like to see more API integration to have the capability to build a report using other third party reporting tools to streamline the operation."
IBM Data Governance is ranked 18th in Data Governance with 1 review while Informatica Axon is ranked 3rd in Data Governance with 23 reviews. IBM Data Governance is rated 8.0, while Informatica Axon is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Data Governance writes "Provides a single interface to monitor and navigate data quality metrics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Axon writes "It has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has". IBM Data Governance is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance and Collibra Governance, whereas Informatica Axon is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, BigID and ASG Enterprise Data Intelligence.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Besides features, don't forget to look at user experience and software performance. One of your choices is significantly lacking in both areas. You might consider adding erwin Data Intelligence Suite to your list. Something you might find interesting: Alation vs Collibra vs Quest (erwin) 2022 | Gartner Peer Insights You can change the products you are comparing, seeing how others have rated the tools you are looking at.