We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The performance is good."
"We've found the scalability to be good."
"The tool is easy to manage."
"What's most valuable in HPE Wireless WAN is that it works fine for customers with existing HPE controllers."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
"Setting up the solution initially is very easy."
"HPE Wireless is easy to use. Integration is not an issue. It is easy to integrate HPE Wireless with any operating system and other brands of switches."
"Ubiquiti Wireless is a reasonably priced, easy to use, stable and reliable product."
"We have found the product to be scalable."
"It's an excellent option for small businesses."
"The scalability of Ubiquiti Wireless is very good. We can add and transfer access points, it is highly scalable."
"The most valuable features are ease of deployment, ease of use, and the interface."
"We use the solution for many of our smaller customers and the cloud management aspect of the solution is very good. If you compare it to other vendors that have a controller, it's much easier to manage the cloud-based solution because we travel a lot. It allows us to manage everything from any place."
"It has a user-friendly interface."
"The solution offers us good situational awareness by providing information on user activity, signal strength, and all the data that you need to manage the system and understand issues."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"The sales sync should connect with and sync up with the customers."
"The scalability and the support could be better."
"It should be a faster device."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"Stability could be improved, and technical support needs to be faster."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing."
"One of the Ubiquiti access points broke down, and it can't be used. It's still down now, so overall Ubiquiti hasn't been a good experience for me."
"It's hard to get stuff delivered on time."
"There isn't any technical support."
"The solution needs to improve its features and offer more to the customer."
"The network setup could be a little easier and more straightforward."
"The Unifi controller software has a small issue."
"The cost is on the higher side and could be lower."
"They should make more advanced features for the power users. I am a technician and I am functional, but I do need some features that I find only in Microsoft."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 18 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and ExtremeCloud IQ. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
