We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
"The performance is good."
"It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products."
"HPE Wireless is easy to use. Integration is not an issue. It is easy to integrate HPE Wireless with any operating system and other brands of switches."
"It's easy to use."
"Setting up the solution initially is very easy."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
"What's most valuable in HPE Wireless WAN is that it works fine for customers with existing HPE controllers."
"The most valuable solution is its simplicity. The solution is simple and easy to use."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution."
"The ratio of highest quality to value is the most valuable."
"Radio management is a valuable feature of the solution."
"Ruckus has multiple radios. Therefore, it supports high speed for users and clients. Other vendors have fluctuations in speed. The main thing about Ruckus is that you can trust it and rely on its speed. I am simply satisfied with it."
"One of its notable advantages lies in the superior performance of its antennas and radios."
"One of the best features of Ruckus Wireless WAN that customers are interested in is the adaptive antenna called BeamFlex. Ruckus Wireless WAN also has the best management platform, and even if there are thousands of users of the solution, it's very easy to manage on Ruckus Wireless WAN. It can also support third-party equipment. It's an all-in-one solution and it has IoT and secure access capabilities. Upgrading the network to Ruckus Wireless WAN is also easy."
"The stability provided is very nice."
"The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it."
"I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved."
"It should be a faster device."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"Scalability is an aspect of this product that should be improved."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
"Stability could be improved, and technical support needs to be faster."
"The controller could be made less complicated, so those who are less technically sound can maintain it."
"The solution could use a better user interface."
"The interface has to be more automated."
"I have some friends who have not heard of Ruckus, but are aware of other competitors."
"Technical support is something that needs to be improved."
"The GUI interface of Ruckus Wireless WAN could be more usable, especially the drag-and-drop feature."
"The support could be faster. It takes time for them to reply."
"The connectivity and mobility for users could be improved."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 18 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.