HPE BladeSystem vs Lenovo Flex System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
3,611 views|2,622 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Lenovo Logo
612 views|464 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE BladeSystem and Lenovo Flex System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed HPE BladeSystem vs. Lenovo Flex System Report (Updated: March 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is easy to scale if you have the licensing.""It is a stable, dependable solution.""For me, the most valuable features are integration and simple defining.""The solution is issue-free and works almost flawlessly.""The solution is very fast and the power consumption is great.""The benefit is the density and the capability for global harmonization on the hardware, because all the hardware chassis are the same. We can also purchase the same network cards too, chassis by chassis, so it gives us a global solution.""Virtual Fabric and interconnects are easy to configure and maintain.""The most valuable feature of the HPE BladeSystem is the ease of management and the robust design."

More HPE BladeSystem Pros →

"Flex System's best features are its performance and stability.""The stability and speed are always good. The processor is good and it's still working with our loads.""The most valuable feature of the Lenovo Flex System is the storage system.""The product is very user-friendly and has many resources at the enterprise level.""The initial setup is straightforward.""One of the most valuable features of this solution is its ease of use.""The Lenovo Flex System is very stable."

More Lenovo Flex System Pros →

Cons
"They should provide open learning materials and seminars for detailed knowledge of the product.""The connectivity speed could be improved.""HPE BladeSystems is an old technology that cannot fit all of the dynamic organizational needs of our company.""​It is really stable, however the motherboard sometimes crashes.""It could always use new tools.""It is lacking in the ability to replicate virtual machines more easily.""The servers are a little bit huge, so it would be great if they could renew the size.""The integration and price of HPE BladeSystem could be improved."

More HPE BladeSystem Cons →

"It does not have the same module flexibility that was present in IBM Blade. On the Blade System, I was able to choose between the Cisco module, or BMC module. Since the switch to Lenovo, I have not had the same choice of modules, only the BMC modules.""The most valuable feature of the Lenovo Flex System is the storage system.""Flex System's integration with the XClarity Management System could be improved.""The product could improve its integration capabilities.""Forced restarts due to free upgrades is an issue that needs to be resolved. We can manage this as we have high availability and redundancy, but without that it could be a real problem.""The user-interface needs improvement, because they have an application from which we have to manage the whole system and all the infrastructure. This application is not working at our premises, because of some problem with the hardware itself. So although we brought it with our systems, and we used it to manage all the systems: the storage, the switches, and everything, nevertheless we have to support every part alone and enter the interface in one-by-one.""The solution could improve by providing more integration with other platforms."

More Lenovo Flex System Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Their licensing program is pretty simple."
  • "With regards to the prices, they need to adapt to the current needs of the country."
  • "The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."
  • "Add OneView and ILO advanced to the base product. Don’t adjust the price, but just include them."
  • "​The price could be cheaper."
  • "The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000."
  • "It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."
  • "It is expensive. There are no additional costs. We are able to get good discounts anyway from HPE, but if the price can come down, we'll be happy."
  • More HPE BladeSystem Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have the whole maintenance for the 3 years, starting the deployment. We also have the VMware license for 3 years and I think we have another license to buy. There are no additional costs besides licensing."
  • "The price is interesting. I am able to quote a client based on their needs and offer them either Lenovo or Dell."
  • "There is a one-off payment to buy the equipment and the support is purchased annually."
  • "The is an annual license cost to use the Lenovo Flex System. If the price was less expensive and flexible overall and for additional features, our customers would be happier."
  • "The 14 blade server allows significant room for upscaling before having to invest in another chassis. You would have to purchase another chassis much sooner in the case of an eight or nine blade server."
  • More Lenovo Flex System Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because it… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.
    Top Answer:Flex System's best features are its performance and stability.
    Top Answer:The is an annual license cost to use the Lenovo Flex System. If the price was less expensive and flexible overall and for additional features, our customers would be happier.
    Top Answer:Flex System's integration with the XClarity Management System could be improved.
    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    3,611
    Comparisons
    2,622
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    400
    Rating
    8.9
    9th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    612
    Comparisons
    464
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    329
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem
    Flex System Blade Servers, Flex System SN Series
    Learn More
    Overview
    HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

    Flex System is Lenovo’s proven, 2nd generation blade, that efficiently runs your infrastructure applications with up to 80% better density than standard rack server deployments.

    Sample Customers
    EMIS Health
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Insurance Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise53%
    Buyer's Guide
    HPE BladeSystem vs. Lenovo Flex System
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. Lenovo Flex System and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 134 reviews while Lenovo Flex System is ranked 9th in Blade Servers with 7 reviews. HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.6, while Lenovo Flex System is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Very reliable, expands well, and is pretty simple to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lenovo Flex System writes "Provides a high initial ceiling before upscaling is required, user-friendly and rich in resources, but has occasional stability issues". HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, Dell PowerEdge M, HPE Superdome X and Super Micro SuperBlade, whereas Lenovo Flex System is most compared with HPE Superdome X, HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge M and Cisco UCS B-Series. See our HPE BladeSystem vs. Lenovo Flex System report.

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.