We performed a comparison between Harness and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."
"It provides repeatable CI/CD throughout our company with lots of feedback on failures and successes to the intended audiences via email and Slack."
"TeamCity's GUI is nice."
"TeamCity is very useful due to the fact that it has a strong plug-in system."
"We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted."
"TeamCity is a very user-friendly tool."
"One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies."
"Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."
"The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine."
"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."
"Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted."
"We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US."
"Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone) to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly."
"Integrating with certain technologies posed challenges related to time and required support from the respective technology teams to ensure smooth integration with TeamCity."
"I need some more graphical design."
"If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal."
"It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there."
"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."
Harness is ranked 8th in Build Automation with 1 review while TeamCity is ranked 6th in Build Automation with 25 reviews. Harness is rated 7.0, while TeamCity is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans". Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, GitHub Actions and GitLab, whereas TeamCity is most compared with GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and Tekton.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
