We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and VMware Tanzu Application Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Google Meet is simple to use regarding configuration and recording sessions."
"I haven't had any trouble setting up Google Cloud."
"Good storage and ease of access."
"There is no downtime. It is very reliable."
"Google Cloud is user friendly and reliable. The most valuable feature is the security of Google Cloud."
"It's a perfect tool for startups."
"You can just connect and start using it through a browser within a few minutes."
"The availability has been increased."
"The solution is integrated very well with a lot of other systems. Also, its GUI is very good."
"Tanzu is easy to upgrade and scale, whether we're talking about horizontal or vertical scaling. It is as smooth as possible without any downtime. The platform maintenance, upgrading, and operations part is very smooth."
"There are a lot of services available in VMware Tanzu Application Service, such as databases and application servers. You have everything you need in one application and you do not need to search outside of the solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to check the flow of all the different variants within our applications."
"Technical support needs help."
"Current technologies keep on changing, so definitely those new changes need to be incorporated quickly. The competition is always out there to be one step ahead. How those open-source platforms can be easily integrated into the cloud, is going to be the key in the future."
"The price can be lowered significantly."
"Workload management could be better. Their pricing could also be more flexible."
"The privacy could be improved so that it is more secure."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"If there were more documentation and training, it would be very helpful in explaining the underlying processes."
"Microsoft's solution is more common, Google Cloud could improve by being more compatible with different platforms or entities."
"The implementation is not easy, it is very complex and can take a day or two to complete."
"Tanzu could provide more granular control over whatever networking is being done on the containers. I would also like to see a slightly more detailed view of application-level tracing. I'm referring to the connections between different microservices. If they added a service-matching feature, that would be helpful for the customers to build or be more effective."
"The solution is currently focused on VMware infrastructure and I would like to see more options made available."
"The solution's initial setup process was complex...The solution could benefit from improved customization and visibility for its users."
More VMware Tanzu Application Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud is ranked 5th in PaaS Clouds with 66 reviews while VMware Tanzu Application Service is ranked 12th in PaaS Clouds with 4 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while VMware Tanzu Application Service is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Application Service writes "A solution with a good GUI and the ability to integrate with other systems seamlessly". Google Cloud is most compared with Alibaba Cloud, Linode, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and OpenShift, whereas VMware Tanzu Application Service is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, OpenShift, Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Heroku. See our Google Cloud vs. VMware Tanzu Application Service report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.