We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Storage and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is already stable and I have not encountered problems in this regard."
"Its performance and security features are valuable."
"The combination of Firebase features, including storage, the Firebase database, and authentication, has been the most valuable. Firebase offers Google authentication, which is convenient for our needs. Additionally, Firebase provides email authentication and Gmail authentication, which are easy to set up and integrate into our applications."
"The solution is scalable."
"The solution's customer service and support are helpful since they are responsive...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"Google Cloud Storage is easy to use, and it's free. I also enjoy the speed I am able to share with family across the globe. The storage is synced."
"It is seamlessly integrated with your Android. There’s no fuss, no hassle."
"Everything I store in the solution is available on all of my devices."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"I don't find the solution very user-friendly."
"The tool should be cheaper."
"The licensing fees could be reduced."
"I would like to see this solution made faster, cheaper, and bigger."
"I would prefer more support for alternative operating systems like DSD. The performance could be better because sometimes there are glitches. The price could be better."
"The cost of additional storage could be cheaper."
"The solution could improve by adding an automatic removal of duplications feature."
"It was not easy to reach the storage because there were different network zones."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"The scalability could be improved."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
"The scalability could improve."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 66 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Microsoft Azure File Storage and Huawei FusionStorage, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.