We performed a comparison between Google Chronicle Suite and LogRhythm SIEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The log folder is fairly simple."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the search option, allowing easy navigation."
"The support team is responsive."
"Google Chronicle Suite is a highly scalable solution with good search capabilities."
"Google Chronicle Suite provides useful APIs."
"What sets Chronicle apart from other solutions is its emphasis on threat hunting rather than solely serving as a monitoring tool."
"The platform's most valuable features are multiple connectors and data output flexibility regarding dashboards and user experience."
"The product's most valuable feature is threat hunting. We can detect the threats directly from the console from the past data as well."
"The initial setup process is very user-friendly."
"We integrated Azure logs with it and that makes it simpler. Rather than having to log into the portal, we can just check everything in one place. We can compare those to our Windows and host logs to see if any problems correlate between them."
"LogRhythm's GUI is easy to explore. We also like other features, such as its integration with other security solutions, log correlation, and the deployment of use cases."
"AXON has the ability to add and compare use cases."
"LogRhythm NextGen SIEM covers all our primary security analysis needs. It makes it easier for us to analyze threats and improves our response times. It's a versatile platform that performs queries fast compared to other SIEM solutions."
"The most valuable features of the solution are network monitoring, user behavior analytics, and log collection."
"This solution has improved our organization in many different ways. The biggest benefit is being able to view all information in one dashboard instead of having to look at several different applications and dashboards. I can see information across our entire environment and every aspect of our network."
"Our clients enjoy having one dashboard to monitor their environments in real time."
"The configuration is not optimal."
"The tool is a little bit difficult to use compared to Microsoft Sentinel."
"The product's default dashboard feature has a few limitations regarding availability."
"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) should be more user-friendly."
"The tool needs to improve tasking packages. Its GUI needs to be improved. The product needs to include time-based filtration. We can only see the alert detection timeline now."
"The tool is complicated for a first-time user. It should also include newer APIs."
"In terms of improvement, the UI can be a bit challenging for beginners."
"A few areas are difficult to understand for someone who has less experience using the product."
"When we had version 7.2.6, there were a lot of issues deploying that version and with the indexing. The indexer was unstable. So, we were not able to use the platform when we were on that version until we were able to upgrade to 7.3.4."
"The initial setup is not so easy because it is quite a process."
"The software needs to work on its pricing."
"It is a product that is very hard to use."
"We do about 750 million a day and some days we do 715 million. Some days we do 820 million or 1.2 billion. But there's no way to drill in and find out: "Where did I get 400,000 extra logs today?" What was going on in my environment that I was able to absorb that peak? I have no way to identify it without running reports, which will produce a long-running PDF that I have to somehow compare to another long-running PDF... I would like to see like profiling behavior awareness around systems like they've been gunned to do around users with UEBA."
"LogRhythm's SOAR and NDR features don't stack up well against competitors. maybe integrating theme functionality as the other do. But in general, it's okay."
"The user interface needs improvement. The more the user can slide around and know what's going on, the better it will be."
"Better integration with different services is needed, as there are quite a few platforms that we use that don't integrate very smoothly with LogRhythm."
Google Chronicle Suite is ranked 28th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 8 reviews while LogRhythm SIEM is ranked 6th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 166 reviews. Google Chronicle Suite is rated 7.8, while LogRhythm SIEM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Google Chronicle Suite writes "Swiftly navigates and analyzes extensive datasets without significant delays ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LogRhythm SIEM writes "The solution reduced our investigation time from days to hours and assists in managing our workflows". Google Chronicle Suite is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, AWS Security Hub and Sentinel, whereas LogRhythm SIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm Axon and Microsoft Sentinel. See our Google Chronicle Suite vs. LogRhythm SIEM report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.