We performed a comparison between Goliath Performance Monitor and HPE OneView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Offers a diversity of features."
"I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."
"I don't have to use CD-ROMs or anything like that to provision the servers."
"Comprehensive dashboard, ease of use are key features."
"Deploys faster new virtual services."
"We also have the 3PAR and the GUI is almost the same. So the recognition is very good."
"Have a single plane of glass across all of the server platforms."
"The most valuable features are the composable structure, infrastructure, and automation."
"The hypervisor and cluster profiles make it easy to integrate with VMware."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."
"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."
"HPE OneView should be able to cover more device models apart from ProLiant and Synergy."
"They can improve reporting and provide more customized reports. Currently, reporting is a bit limited. It can be complex to learn and manage for beginners. Because of my experience, I find it comfortable to manage, which might not be the case with beginners. It would be good if they can make it a little bit easier to understand. They can provide a more graphical view of connectivity and other things. Their technical support can also be improved."
"We have a version 3 and a version 1.2, but the upgrade process from the 1.2 to the 3 is kind of an issue."
"Specifically, it would be great if we had the ability to reapply the server profile faster."
"It's a little slow sometimes. Overall, I think it does what it's supposed to do. I think that as they evolve it, it'll get quicker."
"Technical support is not very good. The engineers do not know a lot about the product, even when asked simplistic questions."
"I think HPE could make more user-friendly interfaces, exclude Java and move to an HTML5 platform, make more detailed documentation, and lower the price."
"The tool doesn't send automated alerts via email...We should be able to receive notification emails when a server or hardware issue arises, which would be helpful if someone is unavailable in the office."
Earn 20 points
Goliath Performance Monitor is ranked 61st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews. Goliath Performance Monitor is rated 7.6, while HPE OneView is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Goliath Performance Monitor writes "Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". Goliath Performance Monitor is most compared with ControlUp and Zabbix, whereas HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and ServiceNow IT Operations Management. See our Goliath Performance Monitor vs. HPE OneView report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
