We performed a comparison between Fortify on Demand and Fortify Software Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortify on Demand's best feature is that there's no need to install and configure it locally since it's on the cloud."
"Each bank may have its own core banking applications with proprietary support for different programming languages. This makes Fortify particularly relevant and advantageous in those cases."
"Speed and efficiency are great features."
"Fortify on Demand is easy to use and the reporting is good."
"Micro Focus WebInspect and Fortify code analysis tools are fully integrated with SSC portals and can instantly register to error tracking systems, like TFS and JIRA."
"The SAST feature is the most valuable."
"The licensing was good."
"Being able to reduce risk overall is a very valuable feature for us."
"You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them."
"This is a stable solution at the end of the day."
"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have."
"I would like the solution to add AI support."
"There were some regulated compliances, which were not there."
"The solution has some issues with latency. Sometimes it takes a while to respond. This issue should be addressed."
"Micro Focus Fortify on Demand could improve the reports. They could benefit from being more user-friendly and intuitive."
"It natively supports only a few languages. They can include support for more native languages. The response time from the support team can also be improved. They can maybe include video tutorials explaining the remediation process. The remediation process is sometimes not that clear. It would be helpful to have videos. Sometimes, the solution that the tool gives in the GUI is not straightforward to understand for the developer. At present, for any such issues, you have to create a ticket for the support team and request help from the support team."
"We have some stability issues, but they are minimal."
"I would like to see improvement in CI integration and integration with GitLab or Jenkins. It needs to be more simple."
"The Visual Studio plugin seems to hang when a scan is run on big projects. I would expect some improvements there."
"Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful."
"We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved."
"This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users."
More Fortify Software Security Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortify on Demand is ranked 9th in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 56 reviews while Fortify Software Security Center is ranked 27th in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 3 reviews. Fortify on Demand is rated 8.0, while Fortify Software Security Center is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Fortify on Demand writes "Provides good depth of scanning but is unfortunately not fully integrated with CIT processes ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortify Software Security Center writes "A fair-priced solution that helps with application security testing ". Fortify on Demand is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Checkmarx One, Coverity and Sonatype Lifecycle, whereas Fortify Software Security Center is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Checkmarx One and Fortify WebInspect. See our Fortify Software Security Center vs. Fortify on Demand report.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.