We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the SaaS solution they're offering now a little bit more. It's a new product but it's easy to install and configure."
"Forcepoint DLP's most valuable feature is that it provides complete end-to-end security."
"Stable and scalable solution for data protection. It offers good technical support, and has no major installation issues."
"We don't require a lot of downtime, but when we do then we are getting proper support with no issue."
"We receive a lot of insights from this product."
"Forcepoint has been the leader in the space for many years and they, are very well established, and mature."
"This solution has a great encryption feature."
"The most valuable feature of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is the OCR."
"The DLP feature in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is good."
"The central management console is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"We get fewer false positives than with other solutions."
"The best part is management in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator."
"We implemented data transfer protection, which allows transfer in one direction only. Users can copy from the PC to the USB but not from the USB to the PC. That way, if someone is carrying a virus on a USB, it will not be transferred to the PC."
"The policy auditing, policy management, and device auditing are all valuable features. Our customers appreciated the ability to get alerts to system-wide events from a single view."
"The most valuable feature of the McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is agent communication."
"It is a scalable solution...I rate its scalability a nine out of ten."
"Everything can be improved and maybe there is a way to improve the user experience through the interface."
"The tool needs to integrate data classification."
"Everything takes a long time, as it does in every software company, especially since COVID. That is something I notice with every product I use."
"The setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"The deployment and troubleshooting aspects of Forcepoint need improving."
"The policy update size and agent size could be improved. We would also like to have a proper solution for Linux OS which Forcepoint does not offer."
"The deployment can be difficult."
"In terms of display, the support and the Mac platform requires a lot of improvement."
"McAfee should improve in terms of customer support and assigning a knowledgeable TAM to customers."
"The solution is difficult to tune to avoid false positives."
"The detection aspect should be improved so that signatures are updated more quickly."
"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator needs to upgrade the technology; it's like their area function is not quite as good as compared to other market vendors."
"Sometimes agents hang. We have to reinstall the agents."
"There are some issues relating to the automation of reports. That's why I wanted the DLP reports. There are some problems in this area. Sometimes it does not work even though all the configuration words are right. There are also some problems with automatic updates."
"The solution could improve the EDR component in many areas, such as the zero-day and persistent threats. The implementation is also complex for this feature."
"I would like to see McAfee reduce the amount of manual work required."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 52 reviews while McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 39 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator writes "Useful agent communication, reliable, but lacking support for microservices". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Zscaler DLP, whereas McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most compared with Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Zscaler DLP. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator report.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.