We performed a comparison between F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and Imperva Bot Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)."It has helped a lot to protect our organization from external attacks, especially XSS or XSRF types of attacks."
"The support from F5 BIG-IP LTM is good."
"The combination of ADC and WAN is good."
"Traffic Learning is the most valuable feature."
"The occasion in which we needed technical support, we didn't have problems with them, because they always answered our questions without any trouble."
"It has so many features. First of all, it has a full proxy architecture, it has multiple modules. The best feature is the WAF, the web application firewall module. It also has cashing type capabilities. It has all kinds of load-balancing algorithms based on your IT requirements."
"The most valuable feature is customization."
"Routing and load balancing are its most valuable features."
"I am impressed with the product's automatic bot mechanism. It also gives us the control to create our own custom bot rules."
"The stability of the product is good since I haven't had any problems with the solution."
"The license terms for "non-commercial" will be a challenge for us."
"Internet and cloud support could be improved."
"The deployment can take some time because you can do a lot of configuring to meet the needs of the use cases for clients."
"If one virtual portion is unavailable, it can cause issues."
"Its scalability and deployment should be better. It should be more scalable, and it should be easier to deploy."
"If they made it easier for engineers to get F5 training then it would be better."
"The pricing could always be better. It's a bit expensive."
"Its price can be better. It is a bit expensive."
"Sometimes, it takes a bit of time for the technical staff of the solution to get back to our company with a resolution for our problems."
"The tool needs to include artificial intelligence and machine learning. It also needs to improve profiling."
More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is ranked 1st in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 116 reviews while Imperva Bot Management is ranked 4th in Bot Management with 2 reviews. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is rated 8.2, while Imperva Bot Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) writes "Reduces maintenance downtime and has a strong user community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva Bot Management writes "A product that offers advanced bot detection capabilities and reporting features". F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is most compared with Citrix NetScaler, Fortinet FortiADC, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, NGINX Plus and A10 Networks Thunder ADC, whereas Imperva Bot Management is most compared with Cloudflare, Cequence Security, DataDome, Human Defense Platform and AWS WAF.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
