We performed a comparison between F5 Advanced WAF and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."F5 Advanced WAF secures our connectivity and combines both the main functions of WAF (balancing and web application security)."
"Good technology for mitigating different application attacks, e.g. DDoS, DNS, and layer seven attacks."
"There is no need to worry about updating signatures because WAF will automatically update the signatures for you."
"The most valuable features of F5 Advanced WAF are the overall capabilities, there is not a comparable solution on the market."
"F5 Advanced WAF has very good stability and scalability. Its initial setup was straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is artificial intelligence and to get extra internal access."
"The initial setup was was easy to install."
"In terms of F5 Advanced WAF's most valuable features, I would definitely say its stability. F5 is one the most stable products. Either as the load balancer or the web application firewall, it is very stable."
"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."
"You have to buy another module with an extra license, to have the authentication feature."
"I would not expect traffic details to pass through the web application firewall across the length of the whole application. I think that there is a web application where it can let the application function without traffic going in into the WAF."
"The user interface (UI) seems a bit outdated. Making it more user-friendly would be beneficial."
"The delay times on firmware patches and software updates could be better and improved."
"The reporting could be clearer and embedded to include our movement data."
"The solution's dashboard could be improved. When you're moving from policy to policy, the logs and the integration of the logs in other systems aren't straightforward."
"Nevertheless, F5 products are generally considered to be hard to deploy."
"There is a gap in report management."
"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."
F5 Advanced WAF is ranked 2nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 55 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. F5 Advanced WAF is rated 8.6, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of F5 Advanced WAF writes "Flexible configuration, reliable, and highly professional support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". F5 Advanced WAF is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, AWS WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
