Elastic Search vs Milvus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Elastic Logo
2,316 views|796 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
The Milvus Project Logo
1,078 views|948 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Elastic Search and Milvus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Vector Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Search vs. Milvus Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,729 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Basem Mahmoud
Sameer Bhangale
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I have found the sort capability of Elastic very useful for allowing us to find the information we need very quickly.""There's lots of processing power. You can actually just add machines to get more performance if you need to. It's pretty flexible and very easy to add another log. It's not like 'oh, no, it's going to be so much extra data'. That's not a problem for the machine. It can handle it.""The most valuable feature of the solution is its utility and usefulness.""It's a stable solution and we have not had any issues.""We had many reasons to implement Elasticsearch for search term solutions. Elasticsearch products provide enterprise landscape support for different areas of the company.""It gives us the possibility to store and query this data and also do this efficiently and securely and without delays.""A good use case is saving metadata of your systems for data cataloging. Various systems, like those opened in metadata and similar applications, use Elasticsearch to store their text data.""Search is really powerful."

More Elastic Search Pros →

"I like the accuracy and usability.""The best feature of Milvus was finding the closest chunk from a huge amount of data.""The solution is well containerized, and since containerization is quick and easy for me, I can scale it up quickly.""Milvus has good accuracy and performance."

More Milvus Pros →

Cons
"I don't see improvements at the moment. The current setup is working well for me, and I'm satisfied with it. Integrating with different platforms is also fine, and I'm not recommending any changes or enhancements right now.""There are some features lacking in ELK Elasticsearch.""The UI point of view is not very powerful because it is dependent on Kibana.""Elastic Search needs to improve authentication. It also needs to work on the Kibana visualization dashboard.""This product could be improved with additional security, and the addition of support for machine learning devices.""It should be easier to use. It has been getting better because many functions are pre-defined, but it still needs improvement.""The solution has quite a steep learning curve. The usability and general user-friendliness could be improved. However, that is kind of typical with products that have a lot of flexibility, or a lot of capabilities. Sometimes having more choices makes things more complex. It makes it difficult to configure it, though. It's kind of a bitter pill that you have to swallow in the beginning and you really have to get through it.""They could improve some of the platform's infrastructure management capabilities."

More Elastic Search Cons →

"Milvus has higher resource consumption, which introduces complexity in implementation.""Milvus could make it simpler. Simplifying the requirements and making it more accessible. It could be more user-friendly.""Milvus' documentation is not very user-friendly and doesn't help me get started quickly.""I've heard that when we store too much data in Milvus, it becomes slow and does not work properly."

More Milvus Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs."
  • "An X-Pack license is more affordable than Splunk."
  • "​The pricing and license model are clear: node-based model."
  • "This is a free, open source software (FOSS) tool, which means no cost on the front-end. There are no free lunches in this world though. Technical skill to implement and support are costly on the back-end with ELK, whether you train/hire internally or go for premium services from Elastic."
  • "We are using the free version and intend to upgrade."
  • "It can be expensive."
  • "This product is open-source and can be used free of charge."
  • "We are using the open-sourced version."
  • More Elastic Search Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Milvus is an open-source solution."
  • "Milvus is an open-source solution."
  • More Milvus Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    772,729 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time… more »
    Top Answer:I don't see improvements at the moment. The current setup is working well for me, and I'm satisfied with it. Integrating with different platforms is also fine, and I'm not recommending any changes or… more »
    Top Answer:I like the accuracy and usability.
    Top Answer:Milvus could make it simpler. Simplifying the requirements and making it more accessible. It could be more user-friendly. However, their recent addition of a support server and their ongoing work… more »
    Top Answer:Initially, I used it with software support and related products. Personally, I installed it locally on Docker containers for testing. I used it for data storage and search queries, mainly for sharing… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 21 in Vector Databases
    Views
    2,316
    Comparisons
    796
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    507
    Rating
    8.3
    7th
    out of 21 in Vector Databases
    Views
    1,078
    Comparisons
    948
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    364
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Faiss logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Pinecone logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Azure Search logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Amazon Kendra logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Qdrant logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Faiss logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    LanceDB logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Chroma logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    OpenSearch logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Redis logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
    Learn More
    The Milvus Project
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.

    Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.

    Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.

    At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.

    Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.

    In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.

    Milvus is a powerful tool for efficiently storing and retrieving large-scale vectors or embeddings. It is widely used in applications such as similarity search, recommendation systems, image and video retrieval, and natural language processing. 

    With its fast and accurate search capabilities, scalability, and support for multiple programming languages, Milvus is suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases. 

    Users appreciate its efficient search capabilities, ability to handle large-scale data, support for various data types, and user-friendly interface. 

    Milvus enables easy retrieval of information from vast datasets, regardless of the data format, and is praised for its high performance and scalability. The intuitive and easy-to-use interface is also highlighted as a valuable aspect of the platform.

    Sample Customers
    T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
    1. Alibaba Group 2. Tencent 3. Baidu 4. JD.com 5. Meituan 6. Xiaomi 7. Didi Chuxing 8. ByteDance 9. Huawei 10. ZTE 11. Lenovo 12. Haier 13. China Mobile 14. China Telecom 15. China Unicom 16. Ping An Insurance 17. China Life Insurance 18. Industrial and Commercial Bank of China 19. Bank of China 20. Agricultural Bank of China 21. China Construction Bank 22. PetroChina 23. Sinopec 24. China National Offshore Oil Corporation 25. China Southern Airlines 26. Air China 27. China Eastern Airlines 28. China Railway Group 29. China Railway Construction Corporation 30. China Communications Construction Company 31. China Merchants Group 32. China Evergrande Group
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Educational Organization9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Elastic Search vs. Milvus
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Search vs. Milvus and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,729 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Elastic Search is ranked 1st in Vector Databases with 59 reviews while Milvus is ranked 7th in Vector Databases with 4 reviews. Elastic Search is rated 8.2, while Milvus is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Milvus writes "Provides quick and easy containerization, but documentation is not very user-friendly". Elastic Search is most compared with Faiss, Pinecone, Azure Search, Amazon Kendra and Qdrant, whereas Milvus is most compared with Faiss, LanceDB, Chroma, OpenSearch and Redis. See our Elastic Search vs. Milvus report.

    See our list of best Vector Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Vector Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.