We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is scalable."
"I have always found that CyberArk is a very tight, foolproof product compared to most other products available."
"The product is very flexible"
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."
"The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"The product is stable."
"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its ability to reset passwords every time that it is needed or periodically."
"Trend Micro Apex One has good features and is lightweight."
"The main features that are useful are application control, vulnerability protection, and XDR Vision One which we have recently started using. Additionally, the solution is easy to use."
"I can run a full scan and it won't cost too much in terms of resources, which is good."
"The most valuable feature is Vulnerability Protection."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"We've been able to integrate the solution with other security products."
"The initial setup is not that tough. It's easy."
"Its ability to detect ransomware and malware is the most valuable. Its protection is also good."
"It's an old product and has many areas that can be improved."
"It is hard to deal with technical support if you are not certified."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a perfect solution, but CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for Linux has many issues. Another area for improvement in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, specifically for Windows, is that there's no way for you to check credential theft from a text file, such as a notepad file."
"We have had some major issues with the tool, but we have worked with the R&D teams and we have worked with support. There is room for improvement, especially on response times. But they're working on it and they're doing the best they can."
"The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."
"The solution is very expensive."
"The performance could always be improved."
"The support is slow and has room for improvement."
"The main thing they need to improve is their reporting functionality and the forensics for their on-premise consult. They do not have very good reporting features or forensic functionality in the on-premise version. They need to improve that."
"Recently, we had a malware attack and considered looking at other cloud solutions because of this breach."
"We have received many complaints about how slow the system is on the first day of implementation."
"The solution could be improved by providing better training to the vendors."
"The UI has room for improvement."
"The integration could improve in this solution."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 28 reviews while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is ranked 6th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 126 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security writes "We can get consolidated logs of suspicious objects and malware attacks in a single console". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager, whereas Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Vision One, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike Falcon. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
