We performed a comparison between CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and Sysdig Monitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It used to guide me about an alert. There is something called an alert guide. I used to click on the alert guide, and I could read everything. I could read about the alert and how to resolve it. I used to love that feature."
"PingSafe's most valuable feature is its unified console."
"It saves time, makes your environment more secure, and improves compliance. PingSafe helps with audits, ensuring that you are following best practices for cloud security. You don't need to be an expert to use it and improve your security."
"PingSafe offers three key features: vulnerability management notifications, cloud configuration assistance, and security scanning."
"I did a lot of research before signing up and doing the demo. They have a good reputation as far as catching threats early on."
"We like the platform and its response time. We also like that its console is user-friendly as well as modern and sleek."
"The user interface is well-designed and easy to navigate."
"It's positively affected the communication between cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams."
"There is a lot that it can do, but endpoint protection is the main thing about it. The fact that it uses machine learning and artificial intelligence to monitor and remediate the issues in real-time is probably the bread and butter of the product."
"Cloud security is one valuable feature. Spotlight is the other one. There is also vulnerability management and a couple of more features."
"The most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is its lightweight sensor, taking minimal space and not impacting server performance."
"The initial setup is easy ."
"The RTR feature stands out as particularly valuable to me due to its capability to log into machines."
"The most significant benefit is how quickly malware and other malicious attacks are detected."
"Cloud security posture management (CSPM) is most valuable."
"Technical support is helpful."
"The ability to stop/pause and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature."
"Docker containers are completely supported, kind of like "first class citizens"."
"One of the issues with the product stems from the fact that it clubs different resources under one ticket."
"The cost has the potential for improvement."
"PingSafe takes four to five hours to detect and highlight an issue, and that time should be reduced."
"We recently adopted a new ticket management solution, so we've asked them to include a connector to integrate that tool with Cloud Native Security directly. We'd also like to see Cloud Native Security add a scan for personally identifying information. We're looking at other tools for this capability, but having that functionality built into Cloud Native Security would be nice. Monitoring PII data is critical to us as an organization."
"There should be more documentation about the product."
"here is a bit of a learning curve. However, you only need two to three days to identify options and get accustomed."
"I export CSV. I cannot export graphs. Restricting it to the CSV format has its own disadvantages. These are all machine IP addresses and information. I cannot change it to the JSON format. The export functionality can be improved."
"They can work on policies based on different compliance standards."
"The UI part needs to be improved."
"The only suggestion for improvement would be the pricing."
"CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is expensive."
"It would be more convenient if there was an easier way to install CrowdStrike, perhaps through better integration with Active Directory."
"One area for improvement in Falcon Cloud Security is the support portal."
"There should be cloud storage scanning. We would like to have cloud storage vulnerability and threat management on any cloud storage."
"The only challenge lies in token verification."
"Incorporating threat intelligence into the system would be a valuable addition."
"It is needs to automate the actions to take when an alert is triggered."
""Events" reporting (errors, crashes, etc.) is not clear at all in a Mesos environment (i.e., it's not clear what specific container is the one that went down). In a Docker Compose environment, it may be way better."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is ranked 7th in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 13 reviews while Sysdig Monitor is ranked 21st in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP). CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is rated 8.8, while Sysdig Monitor is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security writes "Enhances the overall safety of our company's environment from cyber threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sysdig Monitor writes "The ability to stop and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature". CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Qualys VMDR and Skyhigh Security, whereas Sysdig Monitor is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Dynatrace. See our CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. Sysdig Monitor report.
See our list of best Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.