Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud are both endpoint protection platforms (EPP) that provide comprehensive security for business endpoints like laptops, desktops and servers. They offer core capabilities like anti-malware, firewall, web filtering, application control and more to prevent, detect and respond to cyber threats.
Users appreciate Comodo's default-deny approach with auto-containment of unknown files, which provides strong protection against zero-day threats. The centralized management console makes it easy to deploy and manage Comodo across all endpoints. Comodo also includes patch management and remote monitoring and management (RMM) features.
Seqrite reviewers highlight the simplicity and ease of use of the cloud-based management portal. They find Seqrite effective at preventing malware infections and give high marks to support. Seqrite provides asset management, vulnerability scan, data loss prevention (DLP) and mobile device management (MDM) functionality.
Both solutions are compatible with Windows, Mac and Linux endpoints. Based on the reviews, Comodo is used more by smaller businesses and Seqrite more by mid-sized companies.
In summary, Comodo has an edge in zero-day threat prevention with its default-deny/auto-containment approach. Seqrite's fully cloud-based architecture and integrated MDM make it attractive for companies with mobile workforces. Proof of concepts are recommended to see which works best in your environment.
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"This is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"If you open up an application or a web browser, it puts a container in a sandbox area. So if there's some malicious code, it'll stick there. It also has way better protection for ransomware because it uses heuristics that are pretty effective. We've done a lot of tests with live malware, and it works really well."
"It is a very stable solution, making it an excellent product."
"Auto Containment is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the management of end-user machines."
"It really protects and does its job. It totally blocked every attack attempt, and no attack attempt was successful."
"They offer the whole package. Remote monitoring and management (RMM) is included with it, which is pretty nice. They also have Windows patching and third-party patching. It was easy to use for protection. The containment engine was pretty nice for securing our environment."
"The big advantage is that it has a sandbox if something bad comes into it."
"It's user-friendly, compatible, and accessible."
"The solution installs very easily."
"Seqrite has significantly reduced the time it takes to detect and respond."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"Detections could be improved."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine."
"The product must provide a web filter to block websites based on specific categories."
"They need to enhance the performance of the agents. Currently, the performance is going low when the agent starts a full scan. The agent is consuming a lot of resources while scanning. When there are a lot of documents to check, it slows down the endpoint. This is the only thing that worries me about Comodo, but this issue is also there in other products. It is missing DLP, and I know that they are working on adding some data loss prevention capabilities. They have added some capabilities, but these capabilities are not yet mature. I hope they will enhance these capabilities because it is important to prevent the data from going out from inside. We are protected from the outside, but we also have to be protected from the inside out."
"Their support is not very good because they are very late to reply."
"There are a few minor issues such as package updates and passwords."
"There could be MDRM features added to the product."
"The licensing fees are high. The company should work to try to lower them for the customer."
"The quality of the analysis and the product dashboard is a bit low compared to other providers."
"The security is too week and needs improvement."
"The solution should focus on security, documentation, and simplicity for beginners."
More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is ranked 33rd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 14 reviews while Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud is ranked 57th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 2 reviews. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated 8.2, while Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud is rated 4.6. The top reviewer of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection writes "Great features, good patch management, and useful ransomware protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud writes "Reduces the time to detect and respond with moderate pricing". Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiClient and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, whereas Seqrite Endpoint Security Cloud is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Norton Small Business.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.