We performed a comparison between Commvault Cloud and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The ability to manage everything from a single pane of glass is another major advantage."
"There are many valuable features of Commvault HyperScale X giving many possibilities to complete jobs."
"All workloads can be integrated with Commvault. If we use a new technology, Commvault integrates with it. Commvault is a data management solution with support for building the DR side of things. With Commvault we can rapidly back up and restore any application we add to our environment."
"The solution's stability is excellent."
"The return points are very valuable."
"Commvault is both very stable and scalable."
"The diversity on offer is very, very good. Everything is supported. It's great."
"The expanse of the decoys that they have is valuable. They cover everything on the corporate side that you would think of, such as Windows, Linux, and even applications like SAP. They also go into the OT environment and emulate OT devices as well."
"Integration is very easy and the reporting is good."
"It is a very good SIEM."
"IBM QRadar has improved my organization by introducing many functions. It collects logs from all of our systems in the organization and has functioned very well. It alerts and correlates the aggregate events or offenses we receive through all the applications we use."
"I have found the most important features to be the flexibility, tech framework, and disk manager."
"The product provides a complete platform for ingesting the log, doing the correlations and handling the runtime."
"I have found its network traffic log, network bit log, and QBI most valuable."
"The best part of this solution is having a third-party SOC."
"Technical support is good overall."
"The solution requires improvement with its connection and bandwidth."
"This solution can be complex and difficult to administer because it supports all of the many platforms, so it would help if they could simplify it."
"I would like them to keep working on the new web interface to migrate out of the old interface because the old interface is a bit complex. It was driving customers away because of the complexity. If they migrate everything (100 percent of the features), this would make the product be perfect."
"Mostly controls, visibility, cost allocation."
"When you deploy Complete Data Protection for past services, it's more complicated because you cannot directly back up from the previous service host. We have to build a proxy server, like a middleware, to directly access the past database server. It's complex and hard for beginners to figure out."
"The reporting is complicated and should be simplified in an upcoming release."
"The solution's breadth and depth of cloud support are good, but could be better. Some cloud features that are common-sense, especially on AWS, are not completely integrated yet in the product. They are a work-in-progress."
"The initial installation is straightforward and took approximately two days. However, the process could be more simple."
"Whenever we are upgrading or installing any type of patch, at that time we have some delays."
"There should be an extension where we can get the reports. This could be an extension to the dashboard with the Guardian or another product with limited technology, for example IPS. Now, we only have IBM. Basically, it needs more and more integration models."
"It needs more resilience and functionality."
"GUI needs to be improved."
"The initial setup requires that you have somebody with the proper skill set, and it would help if the configuration were easier."
"The solution is difficult to understand in the beginning and has complex management configurations that can be improved."
"The quality of technical support depends on the IBM support person. Sometimes, it's hard to get the right person on the other side. A ticket coordinator could be the key to better quality delivery."
"IBM needs to invest more into the collaboration with other vendors."
Commvault Cloud is ranked 3rd in Backup and Recovery with 104 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 4th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 198 reviews. Commvault Cloud is rated 8.6, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Commvault Cloud writes "Provides excellent visibility and helps reduce costs and time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Commvault Cloud is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Azure Backup and Zerto, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
