We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Talend Open Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"We're sold on the customization part of the solution."
"It's a good tool. It has the ability to take apart and install whatever we need. It's very good for data, transformation, and loading."
"It is easy to use and covers most of the functions needed. We can use the code without any extra effort. The open source is very good. They have the same commercials with additional connectors. The graphical design environment is also very easy."
"The standout feature for me is the user-friendly nature of the components."
"The drag-and-drop feature in the interface is very good."
"Open Studio's best features are that it's user-friendly, even for beginners, and very easy to implement."
"The most valuable feature of Talend Open Studio is the tMap component. There is a lot of functionality in one component."
"We have contacted their technical support. They are great. They offer very professional help. If I need some technical answer, they are very professional. They are quick, professional, and very accurate."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Having additional training materials, such as a video tutorial, would be an improvement."
"The server-side should be completely revamped."
"The user interface could be made simpler."
"I think my biggest problem with the tool is that the errors are very hard to debug."
"It needs better installation configuration for other databases. Although the installation allows you to select another database, this doesn't mean that all connection points in the application point to the database selected. You actually need to do a search through the entire install to locate the configuration settings and change them."
"he overall marketing and documentation of this product need to improve a lot."
"The technical support and documentation need a lot of work to come up to standard."
"In the next release, Open Studio should include cloud storage as an input."
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 61st in Data Integration while Talend Open Studio is ranked 5th in Data Integration with 48 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Talend Open Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Talend Open Studio writes "Intuitive interface and documentation make it simple to build jobs and APIs and logging helps pinpoint and resolve issues quickly". CloverETL is most compared with SSIS and iWay Universal Adapter Framework, whereas Talend Open Studio is most compared with SSIS, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Talend Data Fabric, Talend Data Management Platform and Informatica PowerCenter. See our CloverETL vs. Talend Open Studio report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.