We performed a comparison between Cisco Threat Grid and Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is easy to implement and is very scalable. It also comes with very good documentation. Cisco provides good technical support as well."
"The simplicity of implementation is valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with firewalls. It's integrated with AMP so the ecosystem with equal solutions from Threat Grid is good with CISCO products."
"The solution blocks incoming threats on the local PC or any cloud-based threats."
"The solution is well integrated with other Microsoft security products."
"You can use it to monitor third parties and ensure they are not under threat attacks. It is beneficial in the GRC model."
"It just runs in the background. I don't have to worry about, making sure it's Intelligence. So, you know, this kind of makes it very easy, have to worry about installing. It is easy to use."
"The product provides efficient email security for sending links and file attachments."
"The product's anti-spam and malware-scanning features are useful. We scan email attachments, documents, and malicious codes."
"It is very scalable. There are approximately 2,000 endpoints and up to 200 servers in our company."
"The user interface is pretty user-friendly."
"I was told that the user interface could be more user friendly and easy in comparison to that of competitors. I remember that there is a competitor who has a much easier interface for many users to interact with."
"Support must be improved."
"They come in and have multiple management solutions but it doesn't scan or doesn't have the ability to look at every file extension."
"The price point is something they can improve slightly for those who don't have an M 365 E5."
"A stable licensing model is absent"
"There could be AI functionality included for features like reporting and dashboard preparation."
"It would be beneficial to enhance the pricing structure and make it more affordable."
"The product's dashboard and incident reports functionality needs enhancement."
"It's a bit complicated to manage because you have many dependencies of servers, many dependencies in queue, and so on. Entries or different endpoints, and you make different configuration topics for each one. So that's a major problem."
"The software is expensive."
"I would like to see more integration with other solutions. For example, integration well with Microsoft but not with other solutions."
More Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Threat Grid is ranked 21st in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is ranked 3rd in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 27 reviews. Cisco Threat Grid is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Threat Grid writes "Has good integration with firewalls but has limited file extensions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence writes "A tool that offers endpoint protection with low maintenance costs". Cisco Threat Grid is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, whereas Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, STAXX, VirusTotal, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) and Splunk Mission Control. See our Cisco Threat Grid vs. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
