We performed a comparison between Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and One Identity Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."I've had no issues with scalability. I started using it on two campuses, and now I'm using it across the country and scaling it across subsidiaries in other countries."
"At the moment, ISE seems to integrate very well with a number of other technologies."
"We were originally a Cisco shop and Cisco ISE integrated well with our other Cisco switches and networks."
"There are a lot of integrations available with multiple vendors. This has made the solution easier to work with."
"Cisco ISE is a comprehensive solution that allows you to control access to network resources granularly based on policies."
"Stable network administration solution that can be installed easily, and comes with fast technical support."
"The product is useful for device administration."
"Cisco ISE's integration with other external identity servers like Duende is very simple and easy."
"One Identity Manager is flexible and offers numerous connectors that enable us to serve as the core component of the system, as well as to construct our own connectors using the API."
"One Identity Manager offers several features that I found advantageous compared to other tools."
"One Identity's biggest benefit is application integration."
"This solution is better on the IT personnel, because now they spend less (or almost no time) managing user rights."
"It brings simplicity into complex matters."
"It's a huge toolkit, and you can do a lot of stuff with it. You can extend nearly everything, so if you want to build something that may not have been though of by the vendor. Compared with other distributors who design their products to certain specification, you can put in your own processes, because not all companies function the same. You can write what you want, and the process should be like that."
"This solution has helped to increase employee productivity when it comes to provisioning users in our systems. This solution has been really been effective with our retail workers. It wouldn't be possible to onboard and manage our 40,000 store employees without it. The management of the solution is pretty automated."
"The solution offers good integration with other environments such as SAP and Active Directory, et cetera."
"The solution can lag somewhat as we have a large database."
"The primary issue is the slowness of the application and the web interface. We have multiple admin nodes and app nodes. So when I need to get some information about a particular user, the GUI would take ten to fifteen seconds in loading when we need to know right away."
"I believe that Cisco can improve the way its policies are built because it's a little complex."
"If Cisco could grant more control, the features could be more focused on network and security administration, reducing the need for integration with other components."
"The licensing documentation needs to be better."
"The initial setup was a little bit complex. It's not that simple because it requires a lot of prerequisites for the solution to get a hold on."
"With the recent release of the solution, we had a bunch of bugs and we had to delay our deployment. Other than that, the solution is good."
"The interface could be more user-friendly and the ability to apply rules to MAC addresses, for example, if I wanted to allow a certain MAC address access at a particular time I cannot make this adjustment."
"A tool called Analyzer is included to assist with birthright generation. The tool isn't very user-friendly."
"The product's GUI could be more user-friendly."
"The support team could be improved on. The first level of support essentially looks up knowledge base articles and often can't provide the answer needed."
"The initial set up was quite complex. It takes quite some time to get use to this product because of its complexity."
"It should be able to give a client version of the product, rather than just a web-portal."
"Transitioning from legacy technologies, like for a seasoned web designer moving to Angular, can be challenging and requires dedicated learning."
"Their technical support's attitude is a bit strange. Quite often, we have to prove that there is a problem with the product rather than having them prove that there is not a problem with the product."
"We are trying to get rid stability issues from the legacy version. We are now implementing version 8.2, which is so much better than version 6."
More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is ranked 1st in Network Access Control (NAC) with 138 reviews while One Identity Manager is ranked 3rd in Identity Management (IM) with 77 reviews. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is rated 8.2, while One Identity Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) writes "Gives us that extra ability to assist the end user and make sure that we are making them happy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Manager writes "The JML is customizable but the support team isn't strong". Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Genian NAC, whereas One Identity Manager is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Oracle Identity Governance, EVOLVEUM midPoint, ForgeRock and One Identity Active Roles.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.