We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and GitHub based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable product."
"It can integrate very well with DAST solutions. So both of them are combined into an integrated solution for customers running application security."
"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."
"It's not an obstacle for developers. They can easily write their code and make it more secure with Checkmarx."
"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis. So, it's very handy."
"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."
"The most valuable feature of Checkmarx is the user interface, it is very easy to use. We do not need to configure anything, we only have to scan to see the results."
"The only thing I like is that Checkmarx does not need to compile."
"GitHub allows us the option to push files from a non-UA method or directly upload files from the UA. You can integrate GitHub with Jenkins to do CI/CD."
"The most valuable features of GitHub are the ease of integration into Microsoft Azure DevOps. The process that you need to deploy into Microsoft Azure becomes fairly simple and the templates are already available, a lot of the engineers find it easier to use."
"The most valuable feature is help offered by the community for open-source projects."
"GitHub have a built-in software application development environment and this has been most useful."
"The most valuable feature of GitHub is version control and continuous integration."
"The deployment is fast since we just have to run the script, and once it's done, it takes a few minutes."
"I have found GitHub stable."
"GitHub's source code management is top-notch. It's easy to inspect changes and visualize code and differences. Their action system is comprehensive in terms of making changes and automation."
"Meta data is always needed."
"Checkmarx could improve the speed of the scans."
"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."
"I would like the product to include more debugging and developed tools. It needs to also add enhancements on the coding side."
"Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation."
"The statistics module has a function that allows you to show some statistics, but I think it's limited. Maybe it needs more information."
"The plugins for the development environment have room for improvements such as for Android Studio and X code."
"The resolutions should also be provided. For example, if the user faces any problem regarding an installation due to the internal security policies of their company, there should be a resolution offered."
"The UI is a little outdated, so that could be improved."
"The ticketing system is not working."
"Though I haven't done much research, GitHub lacks in providing more functions like GitLab."
"We would like this solution to have a more user-friendly interface."
"GitHub could expand the limits of the free version."
"The solution should have less integration with the AI part, but it needs to add features with other automation tools so that it can be easily integrated."
"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."
"GitHub could improve by being more user-friendly."
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews while GitHub is ranked 12th in Application Security Tools with 71 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while GitHub is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and GitLab, whereas GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, Fortify on Demand and IBM Rational ClearCase. See our Checkmarx One vs. GitHub report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
