We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Fortra Tripwire IP360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The feature that I have found most valuable is that its number of false positives is less than the other security application platforms. Its ease of use is another good feature. It also supports most of the languages."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the SCA module and the code-checking module. Additionally, the solutions are explanatory and helpful."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time."
"Apart from software scanning, software composition scanning is valuable."
"Checkmarx pinpoints the vulnerability in the code and also presents the flow of malicious input across the application."
"It shows in-depth code of where actual vulnerabilities are."
"What I like best about Checkmarx is that it has fewer false positives than other products, giving you better results."
"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."
"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."
"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."
"We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."
"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."
"Checkmarx needs to improve the false positives and provide more accuracy in identifying vulnerabilities. It misses important vulnerabilities."
"Checkmarx has a slightly difficult compilation with the CI/CD pipeline."
"Checkmarx being Windows only is a hindrance. Another problem is: why can't I choose PostgreSQL?"
"I really would like to integrate it as a service along with the SAP HANA Cloud Platform. It will then be easy to use it directly as a service."
"Checkmarx is not good because it has too many false positive issues."
"The lack of ability to review compiled source code. It would then be able to compete with other scanning tools, such as Veracode."
"You can't use it in the continuous delivery pipeline because the scanning takes too much time."
"I am not very impressed by the technical support."
"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."
"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."
Checkmarx One is ranked 11th in Vulnerability Management with 67 reviews while Fortra Tripwire IP360 is ranked 39th in Vulnerability Management with 6 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Fortra Tripwire IP360 is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortra Tripwire IP360 writes "The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Fortra Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus. See our Checkmarx One vs. Fortra Tripwire IP360 report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.