We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard WAF and Checkmarx One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results."
"Whenever there was a new CVE, Check Point CloudGuard WAF used to block them."
"The portal is quite intuitive."
"It offers good functionality of the application that is currently running."
"Its ability to adapt to our applications and ensure our security policies are followed is a big plus."
"The tool helps us to block IPs and applications."
"It provides advanced analytics that gives each team time to prepare for any threat that might occur in the future."
"The most effective CloudGuard feature for threat prevention is its web app protection."
"The solution is always updating to continuously add items that create a level of safety from vulnerabilities. It's one of the key features they provide that's an excellent selling point. They're always ahead of the game when it comes to finding any vulnerabilities within the database."
"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."
"The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly."
"The product's most valuable feature is static code and supply chain effect analysis. It provides a lot of visibility."
"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis. So, it's very handy."
"It has all the features we need."
"The most valuable feature is the simple user interface."
"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."
"You need to know exactly the system. You cannot have someone running the system if they don't have the knowledge to do so."
"They need improved latency in the main window."
"One of the big problems we found in Check Point, in general, is the support."
"They should improve in the delivery of more detailed reports with more information."
"I feel like I need more clarity in understanding pricing for DDoS protection."
"There should be automation of threat detection, risk mitigation, and report generation."
"Improving the process for handling licensing renewals would be a welcome enhancement."
"There are occasions when it interfaces with other systems, leading to a loss of visibility."
"We can run only one project at a time."
"The interactive application security testing, or IAST, the interactive part where you're looking at an application that lives in a runtime environment on a server or virtual machine, needs improvement."
"I would like to see the tool’s pricing improved."
"Meta data is always needed."
"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."
"The product can be improved by continuing to expand the application languages and frameworks that can be scanned for vulnerabilities. This includes expanded coverage for mobile applications as well as open-source development tools."
"There is nothing particular that I don't like in this solution. It can have more integrations, but the integrations that we would like are in the roadmap anyway, and they just need to deliver the roadmap. What I like about the roadmap is that it is going where it needs to go. If I were to look at the roadmap, there is nothing that is jumping out there that says to me, "Yeah. I'd like something else on the roadmap." What they're looking to deliver is what I would expect and forecast them to deliver."
"C, C++, VB and T-SQL are not supported by this product. Although, C and C++ were advertised as being supported."
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is ranked 11th in Application Security Tools with 30 reviews while Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is rated 9.0, while Checkmarx One is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard WAF writes "Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most compared with SonarQube, whereas Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity. See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.