We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management and SUSE NeuVector based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management provides robust data security measures, incident detection, and detailed reporting. It offers IAM role control, training features, and governance support. On the other hand, SUSE NeuVector stands out for its user-friendly interface and automation. NeuVector seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines and supports ISO certification checks. Check Point CloudGuard could be more customizable and improve its vulnerability. NeuVector needs improvements in monitoring, reporting, and hybrid environment integration.
Service and Support: Customers generally have positive experiences with Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management's customer service, citing quick response times and good support. However, some say technical support needs improvement. In contrast, SUSE NeuVector is praised for its helpful and responsive support, although the process can sometimes be complicated.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is quick and easy, typically taking only a few minutes. On the other hand, the setup for SUSE NeuVector can be more challenging, with varying levels of difficulty reported by users. Some users find it easy, while others find it complex. One specific challenge with NeuVector is integrating it with pipelines.
Pricing: Some users consider Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management affordable, while others say the licensing model is a barrier to scaling and suggest a more flexible licensing model. While some SUSE NeuVector users say the price is low, others believe there is room for improvement.
ROI: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management provides effective cloud management, streamlines compliance, and decreases administrative workload, resulting in a notable return on investment. SUSE NeuVector is particularly advantageous for industries with significant risk and exposure, but other sectors like retail might not see the same return.
Comparison Results: Our users prefer Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management over SUSE NeuVector. It is highly regarded for its strong data protection and comprehensive coverage of cloud infrastructure. Users appreciate its intuitive dashboard and powerful reporting capabilities. SUSE NeuVector users say the initial setup is a chore and the solution offers limited support for scanning IaaS and virtual machines.
"Cloud Native Security offers attack path analysis."
"It is very straightforward. It is not complicated. For the information that it provides, it does a pretty good job."
"We use the infrastructure as code scanning, which is good."
"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its storyline, which helps trace an event back to its source, like an email or someone clicking on a link."
"It's helped free up staff time so that they can work on other projects."
"PingSafe released a new security graph tool that helps us identify the root issue. Other tools give you a pass/fail type of profile on all misconfigurations, and those will run into the thousands. PingSafe's graphing algorithm connects various components together and tries to identify what is severe and what is not. It can correlate various vulnerabilities and datasets to test them on the back end to pinpoint the real issue."
"I like CSPM the most. It captures a lot of alerts within a short period of time. When an alert gets triggered on the cloud, it throws an alert within half an hour, which is very reasonable. It is a plus point for us."
"Checkpoint posture management gives you visibility across your entire cloud infrastructure, so it helps you with management, maintenance, and compliance. With visibility across all these cloud platforms, you can protect against compromised credentials or identity theft."
"This solution has saved the company from unnecessary data loss that occurs due to cyber attacks."
"Compliance is becoming an important tool for us as well."
"It has an analytics service that does research for us."
"We like the ability to investigate, analyze, and generate reports."
"The system has deployed security tools to enhance effective investigations in the entire company networking system."
"The ability to integrate it with Microsoft Azure Sentinel allows us to validate the logs in an even more complex and meaningful way."
"The tool is also very intuitive; its dashboards are very complete and provide a lot of valuable information for decision-making to improve security."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"PingSafe can improve by eliminating 100 percent of the false positives."
"Bugs need to be disclosed quickly."
"In addition to our telecom and Slack channels, it would be helpful to receive Cloud Native Security security notifications in Microsoft Teams."
"here is a bit of a learning curve. However, you only need two to three days to identify options and get accustomed."
"The Automation tab is an add-on that doesn’t work properly. They provide a list of scripts that don’t work and I have asked support to assist but they won’t help. When running on various endpoints the script doesn’t work and if it does, it’s only a couple. There are a lot of useful scripts that would be beneficial to run forensics, event logs, and process lists running on the endpoint."
"PingSafe's current documentation could be improved to better assist customers during the cluster onboarding process."
"The could improve their mean time to detect."
"The categorization of the results from the vulnerability assessment could be improved."
"I would like to see Test B functions at the application access level."
"Scalability, particularly in workload protection, is an area that needs improvement."
"The entire system is complicated, and the setup process may not cater to the company's demands."
"The reporting dashboard responds slowly, which leads to late report compilation."
"CloudGuard CNAPP could be enhanced by increasing the number of components that run natively on Azure."
"Automation and advanced threat prevention have room for improvement."
"It should capture more information in metadata including communication detail. Also, Internal IP addresses should not be tracked as this might be having some compliance issues."
"We were demotivated by the lack of native automation modules for the Terraform and Ansible tools."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 64 reviews while SUSE NeuVector is ranked 15th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 7 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, AWS GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Sysdig Falco, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Sysdig Secure. See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. SUSE NeuVector report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
