We performed a comparison between CAST Highlight and SonarQube based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It offers good performance."
"The way it tells you which codebase is more ready for the cloud and which codebase is less ready is very valuable. It works seamlessly with most languages."
"CAST Highlight is easy to use and has a good dashboard."
"The most valuable features of the CAST Highlight are the interface and there are three notations that are very simple to understand and communicate with."
"The most valuable features of CAST Highlight are automation and speed."
"The overall quality of the indicator is good."
"The SonarQube dashboard looks great."
"Any developer can easily identify issues using the process flow or steps provided by SonarQube. In terms of integration, SonarQube makes it quite easy, simplifying the steps for users."
"The product is simple."
"We can create a Quality Gate in order to fail Jenkins jobs where the code coverage is lower than the set percentage."
"It is working fine. It provides a good value for money."
"I like that it covers most programming languages for source code review."
"Before you even compile, it can catch known vulnerability issues or patterns."
"Its price should be better. It is a pretty costly tool. They have two products: CAST Highlight and CAST AIP. I would expect CAST Highlight to have the Help dashboard and the Engineering dashboard. These dashboards are currently a part of CAST AIP, and if these are made available in CAST Highlight, customers won't have to use two different products all the time."
"The reports that describe the issues of concern are rather abstract and the issues should be more clearly described to the user."
"There's a bit of a learning curve at the outset."
"CAST Highlight could improve to allow us to comment and do a deep analysis by ourselves."
"The ease of configuration and customization could be improved in CAST Highlight."
"There could be better integration with other products."
"A robust credential scanner would be a huge bonus as it would remove the need for yet another niche product."
"Technical support and the price could be better."
"The handling of the contents of Docker container images could be better."
"New plug-ins should be integrated into SonarCloud to give more flexibility to the product."
"You may need to purchase add-ons to get the useability you desire."
"There are times that we have the database crash. However, this might be an issue with how we have configured it and not a software issue. Apart from this, I do not see any issues with the solution."
"The software testing tool capability could improve. It does not always integrate well. You have to use a specific plugin and the plugin does not always go in Apple's applications."
CAST Highlight is ranked 10th in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 5 reviews while SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 111 reviews. CAST Highlight is rated 7.8, while SonarQube is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CAST Highlight writes "Easy to set up with optimized and automated insights". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". CAST Highlight is most compared with Snyk, Veracode, Checkmarx One, Black Duck and GitLab, whereas SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and CodeSonar. See our CAST Highlight vs. SonarQube report.
We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
