We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Cisco Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Technical support has been good."
"What I find valuable is the fact that you don't need to purchase any license. Basically you just get the hardware for the access points, configure an IP and connect it with a switch."
"The pricing of the product is very, very reasonable."
"When we log in to the device, we can easily configure it. So it is quite user-friendly."
"It excels in challenging environments and adverse weather conditions, maintaining high performance without any impact on the link quality."
"It is easy to deploy and has many specialists to help us handle complicated processes."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is scalable. The XV2 model of the solution can support up to 216 people at a time."
"It's a good product and works well when there is a lot of interference."
"Granularity of standardization and technical controls."
"I also like that now you can add a cellular connection to the Cisco router. So, if your operator is down, you can now still have one connection in the office with the cellular module."
"Cisco Wireless WAN's most valuable feature is it is robust."
"I am impressed with the tool's packet tracing so that connection with the devices is always consistent."
"The initial setup is straightforward, and you need to spend around six to 10 weeks to set up one controller."
"The technical support we have experienced has been good."
"I like how the look and feel of the product is standardized to match other Cisco solutions."
"This stability is one of the major reasons to stick with this product."
"There is room for improvement in the support."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN could improve by providing a better signal range."
"The Wifi coverage and throughput performance of Cambium could improve."
"If they could move from the fixed wireless point to mobile, it will make a big change in the market. The cnPilot coverage should be covering big spaces. It should also have an external antenna, not a built-in antenna."
"They could enhance the product's security features, particularly in analyzing and protecting against potential threats."
"Sometimes there are some latencies in devices. Otherwise, it is, for some time, not as stable."
"If it's in a warehouse, it is very hard to deploy."
"The range of the product is disappointing so far."
"The price has room for improvement."
"The integration support technology should be improved."
"The firewall integration is not great."
"There is no centralized management for multiple wireless control deployments or a user tracking feature."
"It is expensive."
"We cannot use wireless for the servers due to potential performance issues. They must be connected via fiber."
"The interface is a little bit difficult to understand at times. It would be good if Cisco were to make it user friendly so that everyone can easily configure it without the need to do certifications and courses to learn how to use all of the devices."
"The DNA space is a separate license cost, which should be included in the license."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews while Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 61 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6, while Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "It's a reliable, user-friendly solution". Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless WAN and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN, whereas Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiExtender and Ubiquiti Wireless. See our Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Cisco Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.