We performed a comparison between Box and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like that Box makes it easy to deploy virtual machines."
"The interface is very good."
"The application is very light in terms of uploading and downloading files."
"The solution is used for data storage and any kind of visualization."
"The sharing feature, with its various permission settings, such as viewing or uploading, is convenient and helpful."
"We've never had a penetration. We've never had a security issue that their support didn't solve. We love their audit trail. We can know exactly when a collaborator opens. We love how you can define a collaborator."
"Office Integration. The full integration into the Microsoft Office products is just perfect."
"The ability to collaborate around data anywhere, anytime is the most powerful features of Box."
"I appreciate Documentum's scalability, allowing for vast volumes of content storage."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText Documentum is the versioning."
"We like Documentum for its capacity and reliability."
"The most valuable feature is that the documents are kept secure."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a central repository for everything, whether it's videos, documents, Excel sheets, etc."
"OpenText Documentum has improved availability and performance in our organization."
"Two things are excellent in Documentum. One is business process management. The other is its support for metadata."
"OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"They could integrate better with other platforms."
"I find their API to be quite complex and it could be more straightforward."
"If there was a plugin that added some sort of toolbar in Office, that would be great."
"In future releases, there could be encryption, to have better security."
"Improvements in speed - Box's high level of security impacts performance, especially when compared with other similar services."
"The upload speed needs improvement."
"The room for improvement is in the area of integrations. They need to establish more integrations, especially with Office 365 and Outlook."
"I recommend doing the trial first, because it's not cheap ware. It's not overly expensive, but it's not cheap ware, and enterprise has a minimum number of users."
"We mostly use the Life Sciences package. That package is somewhat dated. There should be enhancements to the Life Science package and additional offerings to support pharma in particular."
"They should develop something so that bugs don't happen in our project. We make changes manually and some bugs happen."
"The vertical application could be improved."
"Sometimes DocBroker cannot see the DocBase."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"OpenText Documentum is moving to the cloud, and I am concerned about the security aspect of it."
"Documentum is a very robust system. Everything can be improved, but at this time, I do not have anything in particular. If anything, they can put our software in their standard."
Box is ranked 4th in Enterprise Content Management with 39 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. Box is rated 8.4, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Box writes "Allows you to upload and download files quickly but lacks integration with Office 365". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Box is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Citrix ShareFile, Office 365 and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Atlassian Confluence. See our Box vs. OpenText Documentum report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.