We performed a comparison between BlazeMeter and Katalon Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"BlazeMeter can be used for both API and performance testing, it is a multi-facility tool."
"They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us."
"Using cloud-based load generators is highly valuable to us, as we can test from outside our network and increase load generation without having to upscale our hardware as much. The cloud load generator is there when we need it and is the feature we leverage the most."
"With the help of the Mock Services, we are overcoming everything. Wherever we are facing issues, whether they will be long term or temporary, by implementing the Mock Services we can bypass the faulty components that are not needed for our particular testing."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to run high loads and generate reports."
"The most valuable aspect of BlazeMeter is its user-friendly nature, ability to conduct distributed load testing and comprehensive analysis and reporting features. It particularly excels in providing a clear and organized view of load test results."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that BlazeMeter provides easy access to its users while also ensuring that its reporting functionalities are good."
"The recording feature of this product is very valuable for our testing purposes."
"The basic framework and project organization is very good."
"The initial setup of Katalon Studio was easy."
"It provides us daily feedback on the status (failing/working) of the core features of our websites."
"The most valuable feature is that the browser and the API testing is available in a single tool, and I don't have to look at other options."
"The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is the ease of use of the solution."
"This is a product that is well ahead of its immediate competition in features and functionality."
"It has been good so far for API testing on Mac. It is not that hard to learn and use. There is so much support out there, so if anyone wants to start using it, there is enough help."
"If the solution had better support and the documentation was efficient it would do better in the market."
"Integration with APM tools like Dynatrace or AppDynamics needs to be improved."
"The only downside of BlazeMeter is that it is a bit expensive."
"The product currently doesn't allow users to run parallel thread groups, making it an area that should be considered for improvement."
"For a new user of BlazeMeter, it might be difficult to understand it from a programming perspective."
"Potential areas for improvement could include pricing, configuration, setup, and addressing certain limitations."
"From a performance perspective, BlazeMeter needs to be improved...BlazeMeter has not found the extensions for WebSockets or Java Applet."
"Having more options for customization would be helpful."
"The price of the solution is a bit high. It's one of the reasons we decided not to continue using the product."
"They need to work on documentation to make it more centralized and easier to find what you are looking for."
"It would be helpful if they can integrate a feature for performance testing."
"I've seen that our clients are not truly aware of the power behind Katalon."
"The Object Spy is rather frustrating to work with, so I tend not to use it."
"We have had some issues when it comes to stability, which is something that needs to be improved."
"Katalon lacks integration with other software, including integrating other languages like .NET and PHP."
"Katalon Studio could improve having visual testing, but I think they're launching that feature very soon. We would like to see an increase in the usage of AI."
BlazeMeter is ranked 5th in Test Automation Tools with 41 reviews while Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Test Automation Tools with 41 reviews. BlazeMeter is rated 8.2, while Katalon Studio is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of BlazeMeter writes "Reduced our test operating costs, provides quick feedback, and helps us understand how to build better test cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes "Useful multiple technology platform, scalable, but usability could improve". BlazeMeter is most compared with Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional and BrowserStack, whereas Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Appium. See our BlazeMeter vs. Katalon Studio report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.