We performed a comparison between Azure Firewall Manager and Palo Alto Networks Panorama based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewall Security Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has improved our organization with its firewall."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Firewall Manager is the testing and configuration."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"The tool's support is good."
"It is easy to install and does not require any plugins for your browser."
"It's helpful that the solution allows us to control all the firewalls from one device."
"The reporting is great."
"The threat prevention and layer seven security features were the most used and important for us. All operations are quite good in this solution."
"Using this solution means that you can store logs for longer periods, up to perhaps two years, depending on your attached storage."
"This solution is user-friendly. It is centrally managed and provides role optimization, without the need for additional tools."
"The product was great, and whenever there was a bug or issue, they released updates quickly. Additionally, their support was very good."
"I found logging and management features the most valuable in Palo Alto Networks Panorama. Another good feature of the product is that it lets you define global firewall policies and templates."
"The solution is absolutely stable."
"There should be a simple one-click deployment for a firewall, rather than a set of setup instructions that include steps such as the DNS configuration, et cetera."
"We could do only one-way NAT-ing, where the traffic comes from outside to internal, to Azure, which is fine. However, when we actually do NAT-ed traffic to hit the firewall, that way is not working."
"The solution can improve the integration with open-source tools."
"The price is okay. This said, the solution is certainly expensive in comparison with other cloud services."
"The tool's security features need to improve. It needs also to include a monitoring system for logs. It is also complicated to find a query on the Azure firewall."
"It could be more secure."
"The solution's utilization of network ports makes things as complex as possible."
"The customer support needs to be better."
"The ability to add scheduled jobs would be a significant improvement. Panorama has the ability to push out OS updates, but it would be nice to be able to schedule those updates so not to affect the site during normal business hours."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"Palo Alto Networks Panorama has some bugs that could be fixed."
"The pricing of the solution could be considered an area of improvement, as it is a comprehensive and feature-rich product that may include features that are not needed by some companies."
"The price of Palo Alto Networks Panorama could be better."
Azure Firewall Manager is ranked 13th in Firewall Security Management with 5 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 3rd in Firewall Security Management with 81 reviews. Azure Firewall Manager is rated 7.8, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Firewall Manager writes "Useful testing, simple configuration, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Built-in proxy with the ability to maintain your own policies". Azure Firewall Manager is most compared with Azure Firewall, AWS Firewall Manager, FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF), AlgoSec and Tufin Orchestration Suite, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AWS Firewall Manager, AlgoSec, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Tufin Orchestration Suite and Fortinet FortiPortal. See our Azure Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.