We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."What I like best about AWS WAF is that it's a simple tool, so I could understand the basics of AWS WAF in two to three hours."
"The initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment took about ten minutes or less."
"It's simple, easy to use."
"The product's initial setup phase was very simple."
"AWS WAF has a lot of integrated features and services. For example, there are security services that can be integrated very well for our customers."
"We can host any DB or application on the solution."
"Stable and scalable web application firewall. Setting it up is straightforward."
"The access instruction feature is the most valuable. This is what we use the most."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"The solution could improve by having better rules, they are very basic at the moment. There are more attacks coming and we have to use third-party solutions, such as FIA. The features are not sufficient to prevent all the attacks, such as DDoS. Overall the solution should be more secure."
"We must monitor and clean up the WAF manually."
"The product should improve the DDoS-related features."
"This solution could be improved if the configuration steps were more specific to WAF, compared to other cloud services."
"The solution could be more reliable."
"AWS WAF could improve by making the overall management easier. Many people that have started working with AWS WAF do not have an easy time. They should make it easy to use."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
"One area that could be improved is the DDoS protection."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 33rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, F5 Advanced WAF, Cloudflare and 42Crunch API Security Platform.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.