We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Huawei Cloud WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The tool’s stability is very good."
"The most valuable aspect is that it protects our code. It's a bit difficult to overwrite code in our application. It also protects against threats."
"The most valuable features are the geo-restriction denials and the web ACL."
"One common use case is using detection protection for enhancing security models in AWS. Another use case is implementing log analysis and response recovery procedures for email services."
"We preferred the product based on its cost. AWS WAF is an out-of-the-box solution and integrates with the AWS services that we use. It's natively integrated with AWS."
"The ease of deployment of the product is valuable to me."
"If hackers try to insert bugs, the tool blocks it."
"Their technical support has been quite good."
"The most valuable feature of Huawei Cloud WAF is its ease of use."
"An improvement area would be that it's more of a manual effort when you have to enable rules. That's one of the downsides. If that can be done in an automated way, it would be great. That's a lagging feature currently."
"I believe there is a need to move towards real-time analysis with the help of AI and intelligent systems in the future. This would reduce the reliance on manual work and enhance the functionality of detection protection. By incorporating AI-driven data analysis and data science techniques, we can improve the solution's user-friendliness, security compatibility, and accuracy."
"I would like to see it more tightly integrated with other AWS services."
"They have to do more to improve, to innovate more features. They need to increase the security. It has to be more active in detecting threats."
"It's a bit difficult to apply the right rules for the right security."
"We have issues with reporting, troubleshooting, and analytics. AWS WAF needs to bring costs down."
"The setup is complicated."
"It would be good if the solution provided managed WAF services."
"It would be good if the solution's feature set could be expanded to mirror what currently exists on the public cloud."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Huawei Cloud WAF is ranked 30th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Huawei Cloud WAF is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei Cloud WAF writes "Easy to use, but its feature set could be expanded to mirror what currently exists on the public cloud". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Huawei Cloud WAF is most compared with .
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.