We performed a comparison between Avantra and Datadog based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can customize alerts based on need."
"It's very easy to manage and use."
"The most valuable feature of Avantra is automation. The reduction of manual work and having them automated is one of the top reasons why I would use it."
"The Datadog suite has allowed us to easily integrate log collection into all of our services and quickly detect unexpected changes in system data to declare security incidents."
"Their interface is probably one of the easiest things to use because it lets non-developers and non-engineers quickly get access to metrics and pull business value out of them. We could put together dashboards and give it to people who are non-technical, then they can see the state of the world."
"It is easy to implement and scale applications with standardized visibility, monitoring and alerting"
"The most valuable aspect is the APM which can monitor the metrics and latencies."
"We can handle debugging and find out why things are breaking in our applications."
"Excellent autocomplete for everything in the UI."
"The most valuable features are logging, the extensive set of integrations, and easy jumpstart."
"The most useful feature is the APM."
"The dashboard needs to improve."
"We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities."
"The machine-learning is lacking and should be improved."
"All solutions have some area to improve, and in Datadog they can improve their overall technology moving forward."
"They could have better log reporting."
"The logging could be improved in the future."
"The installation is easy for me. However, if you are new to this solution it might not be so easy."
"I found the documentation can sometimes be confusing."
"The documentation could be improved regarding setting up the agent properly and debugging."
"Datadog does not have the feature where you can monitor external websites or check the SSL secure for websites."
"Datadog is so feature-rich that it is often hard to onboard new folks and tough to decide where to invest time."
Avantra is ranked 39th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 5 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. Avantra is rated 8.6, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Avantra writes "User-friendly, simple to set up and easy to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". Avantra is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and OpsRamp, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics. See our Avantra vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.