We compared Zabbix and Auvik across several parameters based on our user's reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Initial Setup: Zabbix and Auvik reviewers indicate that the duration required for deployment, setup, and implementation can vary. While some users spent three months on deployment and a week on setup for both products, others mentioned spending a week for both phases.
Valuable Features: Zabbix offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, customizable alerts, and extensive reporting options. Auvik excels at network visibility, efficient monitoring, intuitive interface, automation capabilities, and detailed reporting.
Room For Improvement: Zabbix could improve its user interface, documentation, and performance. Auvik could enhance its performance and user experience.
Cost: Zabbix has no licensing costs. Auvik has minimal setup costs and straightforward licensing. Users appreciate Auvik's transparent and flexible pricing plans.
ROI: Zabbix has shown positive outcomes and benefits, while Auvik has delivered increased efficiency, improved visibility, and enhanced troubleshooting.
Customer Service: Zabbix's customer service and support have been praised for their promptness, effectiveness, and expertise. Auvik's customer service is commended for its knowledgeable, friendly staff and willingness to go above and beyond.
Reviewers prefer Zabbix over Auvik due to its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, customizable alerting system, and extensive reporting options. While Auvik offers comprehensive network visibility and an intuitive user interface, Zabbix stands out with its customizable alerts and extensive reporting options.
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The solution allows us to spend less time on setup and maintenance and less time on issue resolution."
"The automation of the network mapping enables junior network specialists to resolve issues directly, freeing up senior-level team members to perform higher-value tasks. They can see if it is something as simple as a power issue in a wing of a building. This lets them pick the low hanging fruit. Then, if a configuration needs a more skilled person, they can easily escalate it."
"The biggest draw for me is the flexibility of being alerted. If something happens with my critical infrastructure, I get real-time alerts on it in Teams."
"I like the quick mapping. I can put a customer in, and I can put the Auvik monitor in, and then probably within about half an hour to an hour, I can see most of the map."
"We have backup connectivity in case of some failures. So, it has been of some help. Our mean time to resolution has been decreased by half an hour."
"The appeal lies in the unified dashboard, providing a single view encompassing all aspects of my network."
"The traffic insights feature shows us our network bandwidth usage without the need for expensive inline traffic decryption. It's very important to us. Knowing exactly what's going on, what traffic is flowing over my network is very much an important thing for me to know. We know that policies and procedures are being followed. And so we know that nobody is doing anything that they shouldn't be doing on a company network."
"The most valuable feature is that it will back up the configuration and that it will keep multiple copies of it. If a change is made to the configuration by someone else in my company, for example, and something goes wrong, I can bring up the previous configuration and the current configuration, and it will show me exactly what's different. It greatly reduces the time it would take to troubleshoot because I can pinpoint exactly what was done. I can then either change whatever it may have been or roll back the change."
"It's a very reliable platform and we've never had any issues regarding the scalability or the stability of Zabbix."
"Every new asset placed in the environment can be automatically detected, predicting human failures."
"We detect problems before the customer does and before it actually happens using the predictive functions in Zabbix."
"Zabbix is scalable."
"The most valuable features in Zabbix are those that help us overcome bottlenecks in CPU usage, as well as reduce memory delay. I know that we have only reached the tip of the iceberg of what Zabbix's features can do for us, and we have not used all of them yet."
"The initial setup was not complex."
"The integration with third-party tools and the alerts are most valuable."
"I'm supervising all the IT departments, and Zabbix seems quite good for them. It provides graphics and information in real time. We get alerts about crashes on the system, enabling us to quickly repair issues. We can easily find devices with problems."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"It is amazing in keeping device inventories up-to-date. It mostly keeps them up to date as things change. There were a couple of hiccups where a device would get replaced and the mapping would break, and we'd have to go in and fix the mapping. It was with devices that Auvik couldn't fully discover or devices that would change frequently, such as cell phones or other devices on the network that are dynamic and change all the time. The integration would just show up with an IP address and a MAC address. There was no other information in them, which wasn't very helpful. They were the devices that Auvik wasn't able to discover fully. If they had full SNMP or SSH credentials and Auvik knew what the device was and it was matched correctly in Auvik, then Auvik could push it through."
"The logging features could be a little bit better polished, although that aspect is relatively new. It comes in as raw data, with different formats for different vendors. It's not immediately clear to people what's going on with some of that and you have to read through the codes. Some of the higher-end logging solutions, like Splunk, which is very expensive, can parse through it and correlate items better. Improvement to the logging features would be a value-add, but I'm still very happy that it exists."
"The window view could be improved. For instance, if I'm in inventory and I'm looking at my devices, I don't like the way the window splits at the bottom. I want to be able to choose the way it appears. Similarly, when it shows me all the devices on my network, I don't like the fact that I can't adjust the display to the way I want it."
"If I could make a wish list of things that I would like to see from Auvik, I would definitely love to see more vendor integration with specific manufacturers. They've got that integration with Cisco, but it would be awesome to also have that with other major brands, such as HP, Dell, and Lenovo. It should have integration with more vendors, and in general, being able to quickly and easily access vendor-specific tools from the portal would be amazing."
"When mapping complex network architectures or nonstandard things, the map doesn't always accurately reflect reality. Sometimes the interface is pretty sluggish. It's much worse if the customer environment is relatively large and complex. But even if you split a site that's large into a couple of multi-sites, The performance is still a bit slow sometimes."
"I would like more customizable alerts."
"I would like to see improvement in terms of its integration with other applications and systems. I know that they are adding new systems. However, there is still work to be done there, such as integration with MS Teams. That is not working great for us."
"I would like to see more extensive syslog capabilities. It can ingest syslogs and I think it can alert based on quantities of messages. You can also look back at some of the messages, but it's not a forensics level syslog."
"The product delivers false positives during reporting because of flapping. Other reasonably priced alternatives may have better performance."
"When using this solution in enterprise monitoring, you are able to see that there are some issues with equipment that could be causing a problem. Sometimes you want to make a root command that you do not want to be executed automatically. What we have tried to do is open an SSH session directly from the solution's interface but it is not possible."
"The only improvement I would suggest, revolves around its AI and ML capabilities."
"It should be easy to modify the front end."
"The main problem with Zabbix is that you have to spend time writing templates for all of the products that you have."
"Zabbix technical support is sold separately."
"We had some scalability issues with a large number of nodes."
"There are not too much documentation or manuals. We found the tutorials very easy to understand but do not go deep enough in the use of Zabbix. We need more manuals, proper use, documentation, etc."
More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Auvik Network Management (ANM) is ranked 3rd in Network Monitoring Software with 139 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. Auvik Network Management (ANM) is rated 8.8, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Auvik Network Management (ANM) writes "Enables us to get on top of issues before they become an outage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Auvik Network Management (ANM) is most compared with PRTG Network Monitor, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Meraki Dashboard and Domotz, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Nagios XI. See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
