We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and HCL Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."AutoSys Workload Automation is scalable."
"We run millions of jobs through it every day using it for financial transactions, banking, credit cards, PeopleSoft, payroll, etc."
"It's very easy to work with. The learning curve is not that steep."
"CA Workload Automation AutoSys Edition is one of the most powerful schedulers that you have on the open systems, or going between Window servers; to be able to schedule and take advantage of the different powers that the automation has with it."
"The web UI is beneficial and the granular security policies allow us to cover all of our audit requirements."
"It has allowed us to automate many of the functions of our operations staff. For instance, we had production control staff spending two hours a day entering date parms into our daily business processes. And now, CA Workload Automation does it for us."
"The ability to create calendars, calendering for batch jobs to run on a scheduled frequency."
"It has improved my organization by automating IT applications."
"Easy to set up, it doesn't require a lot."
"Because this product only computes processing days, it is hard when things need to be scheduled according to non-processing days."
"Performance improvements in the UI would be appreciated."
"SQL server clustering is not supported."
"We have to escalate through channels to get to somebody who knows what's going on. It takes time that we do not necessarily have."
"I would like to see two-factor authentication, since you see a lot of companies in the news for security breaches. That is a really big thing for us."
"The solution does not have a friendly subscription model because it forces users to take a five-year subscription simultaneously, charging millions of dollars."
"There is a difference between a web interface and the thick client interface. We particularly like a thick client interface, and it has gone away."
"There is a slow response time by tech support. Unless, you say it's severity level one. That will give you a two hour timing window for them to call you. It doesn't really happen exactly in two hours, but they try."
"The interface needs some improvements."
Earn 20 points
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while HCL Workload Automation is ranked 25th in Workload Automation. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while HCL Workload Automation is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL Workload Automation writes "Easy to set up, good support, and helps to decrease project costs". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch, whereas HCL Workload Automation is most compared with IBM Workload Automation, Control-M, Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.