We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and ESP Workload Automation Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."It is stable, it works, and it does what it is supposed to."
"The ability to create calendars, calendering for batch jobs to run on a scheduled frequency."
"We run millions of jobs through it every day using it for financial transactions, banking, credit cards, PeopleSoft, payroll, etc."
"The most valuable feature of AutoSys Workload Automation is batch processing."
"The web UI is beneficial and the granular security policies allow us to cover all of our audit requirements."
"It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good."
"The customized views that each individual can create, and views that can be made free-form, makes this very popular with the programmers."
"It streamlines processing really well, so we're able to cut down on our processing times."
"The solution can scale."
"The solution does not have a friendly subscription model because it forces users to take a five-year subscription simultaneously, charging millions of dollars."
"We see improvement possibilities in the processing provision of predefined evaluations or individual objects, or in the Self Service portal, which can be used by any user to monitor objects or start objects."
"We have to escalate through channels to get to somebody who knows what's going on. It takes time that we do not necessarily have."
"Some support issues need to be addressed, but not through email, through personal contact via phone or WebEx."
"Pricing model for distributed should have an Enterprise option."
"There is a slow response time by tech support. Unless, you say it's severity level one. That will give you a two hour timing window for them to call you. It doesn't really happen exactly in two hours, but they try."
"To make it a lot more user-friendly, in order to make it so other people can use it without having to do much training with it; the more user-friendly it is, the easier it is to work with."
"I would like to see the Service Orchestrator, a B2B product, and maybe a process audit."
"The new version is going to have more web services where you could string together various web services so that you can create a workflow across multiple web services, which I don't think is there today."
Earn 20 points
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is ranked 23rd in Workload Automation. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESP Workload Automation Intelligence writes "Stable, connects with everything, and has great technical support". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and ActiveBatch by Redwood, whereas ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is most compared with Control-M, Stonebranch, IBM Workload Automation and CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.