We performed a comparison between Apiiro and Checkmarx One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."
"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that its number of false positives is less than the other security application platforms. Its ease of use is another good feature. It also supports most of the languages."
"Vulnerability details is valuable."
"We use the solution to validate the source code and do SAST and security analysis."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time."
"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."
"The UI is user-friendly."
"The main thing we find valuable about Checkmarx is the ease of use. It's easy to initiate scans and triage defects."
"We use the solution for dynamic application testing."
"User management is a little bit clunky."
"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."
"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."
"The integration could improve by including, for example, DevSecOps."
"Checkmarx could improve the solution reports and false positives. The false positives could be reduced. For example, we have alerts that are tagged as vulnerabilities but when you drill down they are not."
"Checkmarx is not good because it has too many false positive issues."
"Implementing a blackout time for any user or teams: Needs improvement."
"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."
"The plugins for the development environment have room for improvements such as for Android Studio and X code."
"I think the CxAudit tool has room for improvement. At the beginning you can choose a scan of a project, but in any event the project must be scanned again (wasting time)."
Apiiro is ranked 21st in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 2 reviews while Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 67 reviews. Apiiro is rated 8.6, while Checkmarx One is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Apiiro writes "A great secrets detection feature, good visibility, and integrates well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". Apiiro is most compared with Snyk, Ox Security, Cycode and SonarQube, whereas Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity. See our Apiiro vs. Checkmarx One report.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors, best API Security vendors, and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.