Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3 comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
2,201 views|1,922 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
8,712 views|5,262 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Amazon S3 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Storage solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Amazon S3 Report (Updated: March 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: What is the true cost of storing database backup to Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3?
Answer: It depends on the storage capacity you are looking for and expected data growth. You would need to ascertain these numbers before looking at backup volumes, and potential costs.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I appreciate Amazon's extensive range of services, which makes it a favorable choice.""We are not that big of a cloud user. We just use it for the storage of our bytes. The most valuable aspect is the storage.""The most beneficial feature of the product for data storage stems from the fact that it serves as a shared file storage.""The initial setup was straightforward.""The product's initial setup phase is easy, as per the configurations.""EFS is flexible.""The solution's technical support is good.""Its elasticity and flexible pricing are the most valuable. For Amazon EFS, you are charged based on the storage. It is also very fast and stable with a very simple and intuitive interface."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Pros →

"The users have nothing to worry about as the solution is well established.""The scalability of Amazon S3 is good.""The most valuable feature of Amazon S3 is its flexibility as a solution to suit many different use cases.""The solution's peak-up time is good.""The main aspect we like is that it's been easy to use.""The most valuable features of Amazon S3 are the performance and hibernation data options. Additionally, there is a feature that provides faster website access that is helpful.""Amazon S3 is a stable solution.""The most valuable features of Amazon S3 are its storage capabilities, security, and integration."

More Amazon S3 Pros →

Cons
"When we faced some issues, the support team took a lot of time to resolve them.""Around 80 percent of the features of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) are available on Linux and not in Windows, making it a major drawback of the product.""Specifically, when it comes to the file system for the learning system, we encountered performance issues with both Azure and AWS.""The product's stability has some shortcomings where improvements are required.""The lack of transparency in the costs attached to the product is an area of concern where improvements are required.""Its deployment process could be faster while installing the Python package directly into the environment.""It could be better in connecting with Windows Server instances.""The interface seems strange and complicated."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Cons →

"We have used the support from Amazon S3. The support is expensive and could be reduced.""The tool needs to improve its flexibility in support.""Amazon S3 could improve by having more frequent updates.""You need to fully understand the solution's best practices to get the most out of its security features.""One thing would be automatic replication between buckets, some feature like that.""I would like a batch downloading option added to the AWS console.""The free web and DB hosting could be improved. It could be faster when you download huge files from the S3 bucket to your local system. If the S3 bucket availability and performance could be improved, we would consider hosting our database over there.""Amazon S3 could improve by providing some type of storage notification."

More Amazon S3 Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It has flexible pricing. You are charged based on your storage."
  • "The solution's price is mid-ranged."
  • "I would rate the pricing 7 out of 10."
  • "The product's price depends on the services and the size and capacity at which it is used in a business environment."
  • "Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) offers a pay-as-you-go model, so whenever you use its services, you need to pay."
  • More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "With S3 Standard, there is not a charge for deletion of objects."
  • "This solution has reasonable pricing and a low cost."
  • "The licensing is pay as you go, and I'm happy with the pricing."
  • "The cost of storage is cheap. However, the cost to have a better interface can get expensive. We are using Athena for this purpose and if we did some heavy queries the cost will start adding up. When the Athena query is running, it will scan the bucket and they charge for how many GBs we are going to scan. The function of scanning has a lot of costs attached to it, this is a negative point."
  • "The price of the Amazon S3 is low. The license model is based on what you use."
  • "The price of Amazon S3 depends on various variables. However, the price overall is fair."
  • "The price of Amazon S3 could be less expensive."
  • "The license of Amazon S3 is based on volume, capacity, and time. The overall price of the solution could improve. The support has to be added if you want it at an additional cost."
  • More Amazon S3 Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Answers from the Community
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This… more »
    Top Answer:We can run code and deploy it whenever we want.
    Top Answer:The product's price depends on the services and the size and capacity at which it is used in a business environment.
    Top Answer:Amazon S3 is very flexible and provides high storage.
    Top Answer:The solution is cost-effective because it is based on a pay-as-you-go model, where I can purchase and use it according to my needs.
    Top Answer:No direct connector is available to connect Amazon S3 with other tools like MicroStrategy. So, I have to use a third party and connect to it.
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 52 in Cloud Storage
    Views
    2,201
    Comparisons
    1,922
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    407
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    8,712
    Comparisons
    5,262
    Reviews
    49
    Average Words per Review
    377
    Rating
    8.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    S3, Simple Storage Service
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.

    When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.

    It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.

    Amazon Simple Storage Service is storage for the Internet. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.

    Amazon S3 has a simple web services interface that you can use to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. It gives any developer access to the same highly scalable, reliable, fast, inexpensive data storage infrastructure that Amazon uses to run its own global network of web sites. The service aims to maximize benefits of scale and to pass those benefits on to developers.

    Sample Customers
    Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend
    Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Educational Organization14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Real Estate/Law Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization68%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    Manufacturing Company3%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise72%
    Large Enterprise20%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Amazon S3
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Amazon S3 and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 5th in Cloud Storage with 10 reviews while Amazon S3 is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 70 reviews. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is rated 8.6, while Amazon S3 is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) writes "Offers integration capabilities that improve areas like storage and security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Cloud Conversations: AWS S3 Overview". Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Google Cloud Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier and Oracle Cloud Object Storage, whereas Amazon S3 is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier and Google Cloud Storage Nearline. See our Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Amazon S3 report.

    We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.