We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Azure Red Hat OpenShift based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Amazon is a really good solution with high performance. They offer more connectors than some of their competitors, such as Microsoft Azure."
"Easy to access and secure, two important features."
"The payment structure is very good."
"Amazon AWS contains a lot of helpful services."
"It has good reporting and documentation."
"This solution features ease of use and market adaptability."
"It scales well and is flexible."
"Stable platform with a straightforward setup. It's user-friendly, with more reliable servers compared to the competition."
"The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability."
"The solution's support and its automation tool that ensures we are secure and appropriately configured are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."
"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."
"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."
"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."
"In Kubernetes, when traffic goes out of a pod, it has to have its own IP address. Every service that's going out requires another IP. But with OpenShift, you don't have to deal with any of those IPs because they use NAT."
"The user interface (UI) needs improvement. Right now, it's not the best."
"Not all of the functionality is available in Europe and our customers in France want to be able to use features that are only available in the US."
"There was some new learning in terms of IOPS on the EBS storage. The concept of burstable IOPS was new and we did have a few outages when we ran out of IOPS."
"There's not much room for improvement but that being said, they can improve the overall process of the overall product features and backend."
"We would like the system documentation for configuring this solution to be improved, in order to provide better process clarity."
"Accessing apps on AWS via my iPhone is awful."
"A person with no AWS experience might find it overwhelming at first."
"The overall convenience and the ease to use could be improved."
"The product is expensive."
"Automation could be improved."
"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."
"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."
"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."
"They need to improve the core licensing model."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in PaaS Clouds with 250 reviews while Azure Red Hat OpenShift is ranked 10th in PaaS Clouds with 7 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Azure Red Hat OpenShift is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Red Hat OpenShift writes "Runs on every platform; makes it easy to adapt to Kubernetes". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Azure Red Hat OpenShift is most compared with OpenShift and VMware Tanzu Application Service. See our Amazon AWS vs. Azure Red Hat OpenShift report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.