We performed a comparison between Airlock and AWS WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Our customers are more than satisfied with the user experience provided by the product."
"AWS WAF is something that someone from a cloud background or cloud security background leverages. If they want to natively use a solution in the cloud, AWS WAF comes in handy. It's very useful for that, and the way we can fine-tune the WAF rules is also nice."
"Its best feature is that it is on the cloud and does not require local hardware resources."
"This product supplies options for web security for applications accessing sensitive information."
"The most valuable feature of AWS WAF is its highly configurable rules system."
"The access instruction feature is the most valuable. This is what we use the most."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to limit access based on geographical location by restricting specific IP addresses."
"The stability of AWS WAF is valuable."
"AWS WAF is a stable solution. The performance of the solution is very good."
"The tool must be simplified."
"The product must provide more features."
"I would like to see the addition of more advanced rate-limiting features in the next release. It would be beneficial to extend rate limiting beyond just web servers to the main node level."
"They have to do more to improve, to innovate more features. They need to increase the security. It has to be more active in detecting threats."
"In a future release of this solution, I would like to see additional management features to make things simpler."
"The product should improve the DDoS-related features."
"The serverless product from AWS WAF could be improved. For example, they have only one serverless series, Lambda, but they should extend and improve it. Additionally, the firewall rules are not very easy to configure."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"The cost management has room for improvement."
Airlock is ranked 22nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review while AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews. Airlock is rated 10.0, while AWS WAF is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Airlock writes "Provides endless features and can be adapted to every single application that exists in the world". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". Airlock is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, HUMAN BotGuard for Applications and Citrix Web App and API Protection, whereas AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.