The solution costs half a million dollars per year. It depends on the number of users. If the number of users increases, the cost will increase further.
Devops & Cloud Architect at Hexaware Technologies Limited
Reseller
Top 10
2023-11-14T09:57:17Z
Nov 14, 2023
Compared to Veracode, Snyk is definitely a cheaper tool. SonarQube's community version or enterprise version is mostly used, but price-wise, it is okay. The price depends on how many lines of code a customer uses in SonarQube.
Senior Consultant at Hexaware Technologies Limited
Reseller
Top 10
2023-04-25T13:24:00Z
Apr 25, 2023
Despite Snyk's coverage, scalability, reliability, and stability, it is available at a very competitive price. According to the Snyk website, the regular licensing cost is around $ 39 and around $74 per user for CI/CD, with a minimum commitment of five users. I have not seen any additional costs to the standard licensing fees in our agreement. I need to wait till our agreement renewal to answer this question more effectively.
Presently, my company uses an open-source version of the solution. The solution's pricing can be considered quite reasonable owing to the features they offer. There are no extra costs attached to the solution because there is no need for extra hardware or other software since it has been integrated with the Jenkins CICD automation pipeline, and the dashboard gives everything in one place.
The license model is based on the number of contributing developers. Snyk is expensive, for a startup company will most likely use the community edition, while larger companies will buy the licensed version. The price of Snyk is more than other SLA tools.
Pricing-wise, it is not expensive as compared to other tools. If you have a couple of licenses, you can scan a certain number of projects. It just needs to be attached to them.
With Snyk, you get what you pay for. It is not a cheap solution, but you get a comprehensiveness and level of coverage that is very good. The dollars in the security budget only go so far. If I can maximize my value and be able to have some funds left over for other initiatives, I want to do that. That is what drives me to continue to say, "What's out there in the market? Snyk's expensive, but it's good. Is there something as good, but more affordable?" Ultimately, I find we could go cheaper, but we would lose the completeness of vision or scope. I am not willing to do that because Snyk does provide a pretty important benefit for us. Snyk is a premium-priced product, so it's kind of expensive. The big con that I find frustrating is when a company charges extra for single sign-on (SSO) into their SaaS app. Snyk is one of the few that I'm willing to pay that add-on charge, but generally I disqualify products that charge an extra fee to do integrated authentication to our identity provider, like Okta or some other SSO. That is a big negative. We had to pay extra for that. That little annoyance aside, it is expensive. You get a lot out of it, but you're paying for that premium.
VP of Engineering at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Real User
2020-09-09T06:29:00Z
Sep 9, 2020
It's good value. That's the primary thing. It's not cheap-cheap, but it's good value. We managed to build a package of features that we were able to live with, in negotiation, and that worked really well. We did a mix and match. We got single sign-on and some of the other things. The Kubernetes, the container service, versus the source-code service, for us, as a cloud deployment, was well worth it. The ability there has been really useful, but that's clearly an extra cost.
Information Security Officer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2020-07-08T09:01:00Z
Jul 8, 2020
Pricing and licensing of Snyk is okay. Their model is based on the number of committers of your source code, which can be a little bit false at times. It can be false because we have some QAs and some BAs, for example, who sometimes go in and add comments. They're not writing code, but they're flagged as committers of the code. That can cause some misunderstanding but we discussed this Snyk and explained the situation. They were quite okay with that. So although the number of people they see in Snyk is slightly higher, they're not holding us with our backs to the wall, saying, "Hey, you're over your license." The only cost is whatever you run on your cloud. If you deploy the CLI integration and you run Snyk you need to take into account the cost, but it's not huge.
Their licensing model is fairly robust and scalable for our needs. I believe we have reached a reasonable agreement on the licensing to enable hundreds of developers to participate in this product offering. The solution is very tailored towards developers and its licensing model works well for us.
Manager, Information Security Architecture at a consultancy with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2020-05-21T06:20:00Z
May 21, 2020
It's inexpensive and easy to license. It comes in standard package sizing, which is straightforward. This information is publicly found on their website.
Snyk is a user-friendly security solution that enables users to safely develop and use open source code. Users can create automatic scans that allow them to keep a close eye on their code and prevent bad actors from exploiting vulnerabilities. This enables users to find and remove vulnerabilities soon after they appear.
Benefits of Snyk
Some of the benefits of using Snyk include:
Conserves resources: Snyk easily integrates with other security solutions and uses their security features to...
The product's price is okay. My company isn't actively looking for replacement tools.
Snyk is an expensive solution.
The solution costs half a million dollars per year. It depends on the number of users. If the number of users increases, the cost will increase further.
Compared to Veracode, Snyk is definitely a cheaper tool. SonarQube's community version or enterprise version is mostly used, but price-wise, it is okay. The price depends on how many lines of code a customer uses in SonarQube.
The product has good pricing.
On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a three. It is a cheap solution.
I rate Snyk three out of 10 for affordability. The price is relatively high, but it's worth it.
Despite Snyk's coverage, scalability, reliability, and stability, it is available at a very competitive price. According to the Snyk website, the regular licensing cost is around $ 39 and around $74 per user for CI/CD, with a minimum commitment of five users. I have not seen any additional costs to the standard licensing fees in our agreement. I need to wait till our agreement renewal to answer this question more effectively.
Presently, my company uses an open-source version of the solution. The solution's pricing can be considered quite reasonable owing to the features they offer. There are no extra costs attached to the solution because there is no need for extra hardware or other software since it has been integrated with the Jenkins CICD automation pipeline, and the dashboard gives everything in one place.
The solution is less expensive than Black Duck.
The price of the solution is expensive compared to other solutions.
Cost-wise, it's similar to Veracode, but I don't know the exact cost.
We are using the open-source version for the scans. We will be going with the full source, license-based version as soon as possible.
I didn't think the price was that great, but it wasn't that bad, either. I'd rate their pricing as average in the market.
We're using the open source version for now.
The license model is based on the number of contributing developers. Snyk is expensive, for a startup company will most likely use the community edition, while larger companies will buy the licensed version. The price of Snyk is more than other SLA tools.
It is pretty expensive. It is not a cheap product.
You can get a good deal with Snyk for pricing. It's a little expensive, but it is worth it.
Pricing-wise, it is not expensive as compared to other tools. If you have a couple of licenses, you can scan a certain number of projects. It just needs to be attached to them.
The pricing is reasonable.
With Snyk, you get what you pay for. It is not a cheap solution, but you get a comprehensiveness and level of coverage that is very good. The dollars in the security budget only go so far. If I can maximize my value and be able to have some funds left over for other initiatives, I want to do that. That is what drives me to continue to say, "What's out there in the market? Snyk's expensive, but it's good. Is there something as good, but more affordable?" Ultimately, I find we could go cheaper, but we would lose the completeness of vision or scope. I am not willing to do that because Snyk does provide a pretty important benefit for us. Snyk is a premium-priced product, so it's kind of expensive. The big con that I find frustrating is when a company charges extra for single sign-on (SSO) into their SaaS app. Snyk is one of the few that I'm willing to pay that add-on charge, but generally I disqualify products that charge an extra fee to do integrated authentication to our identity provider, like Okta or some other SSO. That is a big negative. We had to pay extra for that. That little annoyance aside, it is expensive. You get a lot out of it, but you're paying for that premium.
It's good value. That's the primary thing. It's not cheap-cheap, but it's good value. We managed to build a package of features that we were able to live with, in negotiation, and that worked really well. We did a mix and match. We got single sign-on and some of the other things. The Kubernetes, the container service, versus the source-code service, for us, as a cloud deployment, was well worth it. The ability there has been really useful, but that's clearly an extra cost.
The price is good. Snyk had a good price compared to the competition, who had higher pricing than them. Also, their licensing and billing are clear.
Pricing and licensing of Snyk is okay. Their model is based on the number of committers of your source code, which can be a little bit false at times. It can be false because we have some QAs and some BAs, for example, who sometimes go in and add comments. They're not writing code, but they're flagged as committers of the code. That can cause some misunderstanding but we discussed this Snyk and explained the situation. They were quite okay with that. So although the number of people they see in Snyk is slightly higher, they're not holding us with our backs to the wall, saying, "Hey, you're over your license." The only cost is whatever you run on your cloud. If you deploy the CLI integration and you run Snyk you need to take into account the cost, but it's not huge.
Their licensing model is fairly robust and scalable for our needs. I believe we have reached a reasonable agreement on the licensing to enable hundreds of developers to participate in this product offering. The solution is very tailored towards developers and its licensing model works well for us.
It's inexpensive and easy to license. It comes in standard package sizing, which is straightforward. This information is publicly found on their website.