It is highly efficient and easily scalable, particularly for handling large databases. When it comes to relational databases, they are a strong choice, scoring nine or even ten out of ten in terms of suitability.
Senior Reg Reporting Consultant at Bank of America
Real User
Top 5
2023-03-27T12:32:49Z
Mar 27, 2023
It is a good product. Also, it receives a patch update from the back end every quarter for maintenance purposes. I recommend the solution and rate it as an eight.
Director, Financial Systems at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
2022-04-27T08:19:45Z
Apr 27, 2022
Essbase is a powerful tool that continues to provide value for companies. It's also one of the core databases that Oracle uses. I'd rate it as ten out of ten.
Senior Hyperion Consultant at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2022-01-12T21:38:38Z
Jan 12, 2022
While the product can be used both on the cloud and on-premises, I have not tried the cloud version. I would advise new users to make sure they do very thorough design sessions beforehand instead of just jumping into it. Planning is important in terms of success. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've been pretty happy with its capabilities.
Because Oracle products are development frameworks, your final results is as good as the people who implemented them. Make sure that your implementation team is the best it can be, at least for the first implementation. If something is implemented incorrectly at the start, it'll cost you a lot more to fix than to build a new system from scratch. Sometimes it can be so badly designed that it is impossible to fix. I've been working on implementation for 20 years and I have seen bad implementations everywhere. In fact, I have seen the same tools implemented in the same team by two different people, with one being a success and the other a failure. In the same company, one department says that the tool does not work for them and another says that the tool is the best. The only difference was the implementer. Make sure you get a good team to implement it. The tool has its flaws, but most of time (99%) it is the implementer's fault that you have a bad or slow model.
According to the PeerSpot community, the key factors that make up a good Database Development and Management solution include speed and performance, ease of development, availability, and reliability, but security is the most influential decision-maker of all. More complex features that are also highly rated include query optimization and data handling, while monitoring and cost for value weighed in as well.
It is highly efficient and easily scalable, particularly for handling large databases. When it comes to relational databases, they are a strong choice, scoring nine or even ten out of ten in terms of suitability.
It is a good product. Also, it receives a patch update from the back end every quarter for maintenance purposes. I recommend the solution and rate it as an eight.
I rate the solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good, but it could be cheaper. I recommend the solution to other users.
We use both cloud and on-premises deployments of the product. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. We've been happy with the product overall.
Essbase is a powerful tool that continues to provide value for companies. It's also one of the core databases that Oracle uses. I'd rate it as ten out of ten.
While the product can be used both on the cloud and on-premises, I have not tried the cloud version. I would advise new users to make sure they do very thorough design sessions beforehand instead of just jumping into it. Planning is important in terms of success. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've been pretty happy with its capabilities.
Because Oracle products are development frameworks, your final results is as good as the people who implemented them. Make sure that your implementation team is the best it can be, at least for the first implementation. If something is implemented incorrectly at the start, it'll cost you a lot more to fix than to build a new system from scratch. Sometimes it can be so badly designed that it is impossible to fix. I've been working on implementation for 20 years and I have seen bad implementations everywhere. In fact, I have seen the same tools implemented in the same team by two different people, with one being a success and the other a failure. In the same company, one department says that the tool does not work for them and another says that the tool is the best. The only difference was the implementer. Make sure you get a good team to implement it. The tool has its flaws, but most of time (99%) it is the implementer's fault that you have a bad or slow model.