Speaking about how Azure Site Recovery has facilitated the migration of on-premises workloads to the Azure Cloud, I would say that my company is still in the testing phase, and we also use Veeam. My company is trying to find the best spot for recovery, disaster recovery, and migrations. Veeam plays a big part in what my company does in terms of backup and recovery, so we are just trying to figure out how a Microsoft tool will fit into our environment. I haven't faced any challenges using the product. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.
My advice to new users would be to gain a solid understanding of how the cloud works, know your infrastructure well, and be aware of your system's utilization in terms of computing, memory, and storage. Asking questions and seeking advice are crucial. Don't be surprised by unexpected costs; try to plan and estimate as accurately as possible to ensure cost-effectiveness. Overall, I would rate Azure Site Recovery as an eight out of ten.
I would highly recommend Azure Site Recovery for any IT professional tasked with developing and managing critical business systems. It is one of the best services out there to ensure comprehensive coverage during times of disaster. Overall, I would rate ASR as a ten out of ten.
Team Lead , Enterprise Computing Platforms at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
2023-11-01T12:55:00Z
Nov 1, 2023
I am using the latest version of Azure Site Recovery. Azure Site Recovery is a cloud-based solution. I would recommend Azure Site Recovery to other users. Overall, I rate Azure Site Recovery a seven out of ten.
I recommend this solution for disaster recovery if you're running a production environment that you need to recover very quickly. Whether this solution is suitable for your organization really depends on your business requirements and budget. I rate this solution nine out of 10.
Cloud Engineer at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
2022-12-16T17:41:31Z
Dec 16, 2022
I've used Azure Site Recovery. My organization has three Azure Site Recovery users. The service provider handles the maintenance of the solution. I own the apps, so I'm in charge of the apps, ensuring that the apps always run. Another team member works with the service provider on the security side. My organization also has an infrastructure engineer working with the service provider. As Azure Site Recovery fulfills my organization's needs and is pretty straightforward and understandable, I rate it as eight out of ten. I'm a customer of Microsoft.
The best advice that I could give is to just research what Azure Site Recovery is for. It is not a backup solution. So, even though you have enabled Site Recovery, you still need backups. I would rate Azure Site Recovery a nine out of ten.
Portfolio Manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2020-04-20T07:27:00Z
Apr 20, 2020
In the next release, I would like to see better block-level recovery. It is key. Bare metal recovery and block-level recovery. I would rate Azure Site Recovery a four out of ten. If you start from scratch, it's fine.
Technical Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2020-02-23T06:17:04Z
Feb 23, 2020
We're a partner as well as a customer. We would definitely recommend the product. I would caution, or highlight rather, that if anyone is collecting resources they need to confirm that they're all configuring it correctly so that it doesn't generate unexpected costs because of a context that may be incorrect. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
Disaster Recovery as a Service providers offer solutions that enable businesses to recover their IT infrastructure and data in the event of a disaster.
Speaking about how Azure Site Recovery has facilitated the migration of on-premises workloads to the Azure Cloud, I would say that my company is still in the testing phase, and we also use Veeam. My company is trying to find the best spot for recovery, disaster recovery, and migrations. Veeam plays a big part in what my company does in terms of backup and recovery, so we are just trying to figure out how a Microsoft tool will fit into our environment. I haven't faced any challenges using the product. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.
My advice to new users would be to gain a solid understanding of how the cloud works, know your infrastructure well, and be aware of your system's utilization in terms of computing, memory, and storage. Asking questions and seeking advice are crucial. Don't be surprised by unexpected costs; try to plan and estimate as accurately as possible to ensure cost-effectiveness. Overall, I would rate Azure Site Recovery as an eight out of ten.
I would highly recommend Azure Site Recovery for any IT professional tasked with developing and managing critical business systems. It is one of the best services out there to ensure comprehensive coverage during times of disaster. Overall, I would rate ASR as a ten out of ten.
Overall, I would rate it 8 out of 10.
I am using the latest version of Azure Site Recovery. Azure Site Recovery is a cloud-based solution. I would recommend Azure Site Recovery to other users. Overall, I rate Azure Site Recovery a seven out of ten.
I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. It is a powerful solution from Azure.
I recommend this solution for disaster recovery if you're running a production environment that you need to recover very quickly. Whether this solution is suitable for your organization really depends on your business requirements and budget. I rate this solution nine out of 10.
I would recommend Site Recovery for single and larger companies. I would give Site Recovery a rating of eight out of ten.
I've used Azure Site Recovery. My organization has three Azure Site Recovery users. The service provider handles the maintenance of the solution. I own the apps, so I'm in charge of the apps, ensuring that the apps always run. Another team member works with the service provider on the security side. My organization also has an infrastructure engineer working with the service provider. As Azure Site Recovery fulfills my organization's needs and is pretty straightforward and understandable, I rate it as eight out of ten. I'm a customer of Microsoft.
I rate this solution a nine out of ten. The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
The best advice that I could give is to just research what Azure Site Recovery is for. It is not a backup solution. So, even though you have enabled Site Recovery, you still need backups. I would rate Azure Site Recovery a nine out of ten.
In the next release, I would like to see better block-level recovery. It is key. Bare metal recovery and block-level recovery. I would rate Azure Site Recovery a four out of ten. If you start from scratch, it's fine.
I would rate this product an eight out of 10.
We're a partner as well as a customer. We would definitely recommend the product. I would caution, or highlight rather, that if anyone is collecting resources they need to confirm that they're all configuring it correctly so that it doesn't generate unexpected costs because of a context that may be incorrect. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.