Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, Okta and others in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS). Updated: April 2024.
Senior Infrastructure Reliability Engineer - (Remote) at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-12-07T19:53:24Z
Dec 7, 2021
I would rate this solution 9 out of 10. I have no complaints with the product. It's pretty predefined and user-friendly. AWS is very helpful and very useful for the infrastructure because that's how you can manage your Microsoft Office 365 user accounts with AWS-managed Microsoft Active Directory Services. That is the secure way for users to log in. As a big organization, it is very important to keep the Directory Services in the cloud and manage the Directory Services for the whole infrastructure.
We are an AWS partner. I'd advise new users to take accounting classes. Take cloud accounting and costing classes to help you understand and explain what you mean. That way, when the accounting group from the existing CapEx IT group balks, you can explain the breakdown to them. There's very little training involved, however, you need to get trained in that aspect. I'd rate the solution at a six out of ten, simply based on the cost. It's very expensive. However, I'd give it a nine for ease of use, as it is intuitive.
IT Auditor & Compliance Officer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Real User
2020-04-02T07:00:10Z
Apr 2, 2020
My advice for anybody who is considering this solution is to first make sure that they want to use other AWS services. If they do not intend to do so, then they can simply use Microsoft Active Directory. This solution does what we want to achieve. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Senior Datacenter Engineer at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
Real User
2020-03-30T07:58:00Z
Mar 30, 2020
My advice to someone considering this solution is that before working on this it is better to have good theoretical knowledge about this solution, otherwise if something goes wrong it can impact the entire use. The private cloud hypervisor is not so stable so far. They should improve the stability in the next release. I would rate it a nine out of ten.
Identity and access management (IAM) is the process of managing individual network identities (this includes devices as well as users) to determine access privileges for cloud and on-premise applications.
I rate AWS Directory Service a ten out of ten.
I rate the solution a nine out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by including on-premises access for services through IAM
I am fully satisfied with the solution so I rate it a ten out of ten.
I would rate this solution as a nine out of ten.
This is a good product and I rate it nine out of 10.
I highly recommend any AWS Managed Service. I would rate it an eight out of ten.
AWS is cost-friendly, support-friendly, and its system is 99.99% reliable. I would give this solution a score of ten out of ten.
I would rate this solution 9 out of 10. I have no complaints with the product. It's pretty predefined and user-friendly. AWS is very helpful and very useful for the infrastructure because that's how you can manage your Microsoft Office 365 user accounts with AWS-managed Microsoft Active Directory Services. That is the secure way for users to log in. As a big organization, it is very important to keep the Directory Services in the cloud and manage the Directory Services for the whole infrastructure.
We are an AWS partner. I'd advise new users to take accounting classes. Take cloud accounting and costing classes to help you understand and explain what you mean. That way, when the accounting group from the existing CapEx IT group balks, you can explain the breakdown to them. There's very little training involved, however, you need to get trained in that aspect. I'd rate the solution at a six out of ten, simply based on the cost. It's very expensive. However, I'd give it a nine for ease of use, as it is intuitive.
My advice for anybody who is considering this solution is to first make sure that they want to use other AWS services. If they do not intend to do so, then they can simply use Microsoft Active Directory. This solution does what we want to achieve. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
My advice to someone considering this solution is that before working on this it is better to have good theoretical knowledge about this solution, otherwise if something goes wrong it can impact the entire use. The private cloud hypervisor is not so stable so far. They should improve the stability in the next release. I would rate it a nine out of ten.