Symantec Web Application Firewall OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

Symantec Web Application Firewall is the #17 ranked solution in top Web Application Firewalls. PeerSpot users give Symantec Web Application Firewall an average rating of 10.0 out of 10. Symantec Web Application Firewall is most commonly compared to F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM): Symantec Web Application Firewall vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Symantec Web Application Firewall is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 65% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 21% of all views.
Buyer's Guide

Download the Web Application Firewall (WAF) Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: November 2022

What is Symantec Web Application Firewall?

The Symantec Web Application Firewall (WAF) enables you to secure and accelerate your web applications.

Symantec Web Application Firewall was previously known as Symantec WAF, Blue Coat Protecting Web Applications.

Symantec Web Application Firewall Video

Archived Symantec Web Application Firewall Reviews (more than two years old)

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
it_user1218156 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Straightforward setup but the whole Web Security Gateway can be better
Pros and Cons
  • "The setup was straightforward."
  • "I'm not convinced that it's necessary the best solution going forward in the future."

What is our primary use case?

The clients turned our view on a few aspects. I believe that solutions have changed over the last few years and I think the value proposition has changed quite a bit. I don't really know. I see the value in the proxy for many things, and I feel that web proxy is not the way to go necessarily, in the future.

What needs improvement?

I would say that the whole Web Security Gateway can be better. I feel that it controls the endpoint. But I am not sure if any improvement is necessary on the actual Web Security Gateway installed, which is meant to be beneficial, because maybe the problem lies at our endpoint.

For how long have I used the solution?

We don't use Symantec Web Application Firewall internally for our own company, we only provide the service to other clients.

How are customer service and support?

Our clients had a few technical issues, which were resolved. But the technical support wasn't great. 

Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
November 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Fortinet, Citrix and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: November 2022.
657,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.

How was the initial setup?

The setup was straightforward, but I would say the deployment timeline as indicated, was rather complex.

What other advice do I have?

On a scale from one to 10, I would give it a five. I'm not convinced that it's necessarily the best solution going forward in the future. The technical support could be better, and the initial setup and deployment could be more straightforward. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Jean-Pol_Tamenne - PeerSpot reviewer
Networking and Security Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
User-friendly, feature-rich, and we are pleased with the performance
Pros and Cons
  • "The interface is user-friendly."
  • "It would be an improvement if the management dashboards were not reliant upon Java."

What is most valuable?

The performance is ok and overall, I'm really pleased.

The interface is user-friendly.

There are a lot of features in this product.

What needs improvement?

The dashboard is dependent on Java so you need to have it installed. If there are different versions of Java then it can cause problems. It would be an improvement if the management dashboards were not reliant upon Java.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Symantec WAF for the past year, although it was in the company before that.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This solution is very stable and we haven't experienced any crashes.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Symantec WAF is a scalable solution, although we do not have requirements for scalability. It is possible to just add a box and add capacity, as needed.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is not complex for a network specialist.

What other advice do I have?

This product is doing what it should and what we are expecting from it. This solution is perfect for what we are using it for.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user