When you add new projects for the same product, it either duplicates or replaces the scan configuration. If I run a scan for the same product with a different scan configuration, it should keep the previous scan configuration and not replace it with the new scan configuration. It should just add the new scan configuration. That would be helpful. They do keep the results as it is, but the scan configuration keeps changing. For example, I have set a scan configuration to a full scan, and next week, I want to run a new scan for the same product with some changes or new functionalities. I want to run a partial scan. Currently, if I change the scan configuration to partial, it changes the old one also to partial. That should be improved.
Cyber Security Lead at a printing company with 201-500 employees
Product Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
The product’s pricing could be flexible.
AppSec Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
The only concern I have with Rapid7 is that it does not provide enough information about vulnerabilities within AppSec.
Security Architect/Staff Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
We get a lot of false positives during the tests.
DS
Cyber Security Architect at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees
They should add more features. I would like to see them do a little more on static analysis and also interactivity analysis. Currently, it does very basic static analysis. It could do a little more static analysis, which is something that would help. A lot more interactivity analysis should also be there. It should basically look at security during interactivity.
IT Security Engineer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
We'd like to see integrations with WAF solutions.
NF
Assistant Technical Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The reporting is definitely an aspect of the solution that's in need of some work. We found that we'd try to use widgets, but often getting them to work for us wasn't very clear. They need to be more user friendly or offer better instructions.
MT
Cyber Security Division Manager at 3SC Security Solutions Services and Consultant
In the future, if they can have integration with a lot of ticketing systems then it would be amazing.
CC
Security Analyst at Millennium Technology Group
The interface should be a little bit easier to manage. Sometimes, the logic that they use is kind of strange. They need to work a little bit more on their interface to make it more understandable. The interface is the only problem. I'm using Rapid7, which is very intuitive. There are other applications available in the market with a better interface.
They can include more techniques or options to test different types of security because the templates are limited. It would be great to see them follow the MITRE ATT&CK framework or what is there in tools like Veracode and Synopsys.
MG
Secury Administrator at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would like more details of what the product can do.