Microsoft DPM OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

Microsoft DPM is the #47 ranked solution in best Backup and Recovery Software. PeerSpot users give Microsoft DPM an average rating of 6.6 out of 10. Microsoft DPM is most commonly compared to Veeam Backup & Replication: Microsoft DPM vs Veeam Backup & Replication. Microsoft DPM is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 57% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 22% of all views.
Buyer's Guide

Download the Backup and Recovery Software Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: November 2022

What is Microsoft DPM?

Microsoft Data Protection Manager (DPM) is an enterprise backup system that can be used to back up data from a source location to a target secondary location. Microsoft DPM allows you to back up application data from Microsoft servers and workloads, and file data from servers and client computers. You can create full backups, incremental backups, differential backups, and bare-metal backups to completely restore a system. Microsoft DPM can store backup data to disks for short-term storage, to Azure Cloud for both for short-term and long-term storage off-premises, and to tapes for long-term storage, which can then be stored offsite. Backed up files are indexed, which allows you to easily search your recovered data.

Microsoft DPM contributes to your business continuity and disaster recovery strategy by facilitating the backup and recovery of enterprise data, ensuring resources are available and recoverable during planned and unplanned outages. When outages occur and source data is unavailable, you can use DPM to easily restore data to the original source or to an alternate location.

Key Features of Microsoft DPM:

  • Application-aware backup: Application-aware backup of Microsoft workloads, including SQL Server, Microsoft Exchange, and SharePoint.

  • File backup: Back up files and folders on computers running Windows Server and Windows operating systems.

  • System backup: Back up the entire system state or run complete backups of physical computers running Windows Server or Windows client operating systems.

  • Hyper-V backup: Back up Hyper-V virtual machines running either Windows or Linux. You can choose to back up an entire virtual machine or specific applications on the virtual machine.

Reviews from Real Users

Microsoft DPM stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its robust and flexible backup capabilities and its being easy to manage with one central dashboard.

William M., the head of ICT infrastructure & security at a tech services company, notes, "The automated procedure is quite good for us, as it is able to capture all of the information that we require. The compatibility is very good. We have an IBM AS/400 machine in our office that we're using, and we're able to back it up fine. This is the same for other systems, as well. I think that overall, it is really adaptable, compatible, and scalable."

Mohammed I., a managing director at Adalites, notes, "I would definitely recommend data protection DPM. It has an application backup, a file backup, a system backup and a hypervisor. It works flawlessly, never a problem."

Rodney C. a system analyst at a financial services firm, writes, "The most valuable feature is that DPM has an index so individual files can be searched. This is our primary tool for recovering deleted files or folders. Once we implement a System Center Operations Manager, all of our DPM servers can then be seen on one dashboard."

Microsoft DPM was previously known as DPM, Data Protection Manager, MS DPM.

Microsoft DPM Customers

Medical Park, Centropol Energy, a.s., NCFE, D & H Distributing, Metalor, Colosseum, a.s., Sanitas S.A., Icebreaker

Microsoft DPM Video

Archived Microsoft DPM Reviews (more than two years old)

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
William Mugobogobo - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of ICT Infrastructure & Security at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Good compatibility and the automated procedure works well, but the management reporting needs improvement
Pros and Cons
  • "The automated procedure is quite good for us, as it is able to capture all of the information that we require."
  • "Management reporting could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We are using this product for backing up our entire environment, which includes our ERP and all of the other systems that we have.

How has it helped my organization?

The whole idea for doing a backup is to be able to fully recover and restore, and some of the options are quite good for us. We have been happy with the recovery tasks that we've carried out.

What is most valuable?

The automated procedure is quite good for us, as it is able to capture all of the information that we require.

The compatibility is very good. We have an IBM AS/400 machine in our office that we're using, and we're able to back it up fine. This is the same for other systems, as well. I think that overall, it is really adaptable, compatible, and scalable.

What needs improvement?

Management reporting could be improved.

Buyer's Guide
Backup and Recovery Software
November 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Veeam Software, Veritas and others in Backup and Recovery Software. Updated: November 2022.
655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Microsoft DPM for the past four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I think that Microsoft DPM is very stable. We are a local authority and we are running multiple health information systems, engineering, and financial systems.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have a vast number of systems and we're scaling up to more than 4,000 users. As of now, we have been able to scale up to our requirements.

How are customer service and support?

We have been in contact with Microsoft technical support here and there. We have a local supplier that we work with, and it is important to keep in mind that DPM isn't the only product that we are using. We also use a configuration manager, an operations manager, and a service manager which is the service desk. The entire set is the Management Suite.

In terms of response time, they are okay. However, we've had an issue with not being about to get the kind of reports that we want in terms of managing our environment.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was really straightforward and we didn't have any challenges. It took us between two and three weeks to deploy.

What about the implementation team?

We completed the implementation and deployment in-house and without any issues.

Our IT department is divided into four groups which are security, infrastructure networks, MIS, and solutions. We have three engineers who are responsible for DPM.

What other advice do I have?

We are currently working with an on-premises deployment but we want to use the hybrid option now. We are looking forward to seeing how it performs.

To this point, from what we have been using, we have found this product to be okay and we haven't had any major issues. We are happy with the features that we have.

Overall, we are happy with this product. At the same time, I cannot give it a perfect rating until I see how well it scales in the cloud.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Rodney Carlson - PeerSpot reviewer
System Analyst at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Good search capability and supports full-system backup
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is that DPM has an index so individual files can be searched."
  • "Additional Hyper-V knowledge would be great."

What is our primary use case?

This solution is part of our main disaster recovery as well as long term recovery solution policy. It will work on physical and virtual machines.

How has it helped my organization?

Moving to this solution has improved our backup capability. Zerto is only able to replicate virtual machines whereas DPM is capable of backing up everything.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is that DPM has an index so individual files can be searched. This is our primary tool for recovering deleted files or folders. Once we implement a System Center Operations Manager, all of our DPM servers can then be seen on one dashboard.

What needs improvement?

Additional Hyper-V knowledge would be great. There are some articles online detailing the interaction with hypervisors. Using the built-in tools would speed up some of the normal routine procedures.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Microsoft DPM for over three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a stable product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

DPM is easily scalable. There is a database stored on a SQL server in which the size needs to be monitored.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Prior to using DPM, we used Zerto.

Zerto has a fast recovery of entire machines whereas DPM has an index so individual files can be searched. DPM is capable of backing up both physical and virtual machines.

How was the initial setup?

There were some quirks in the initial setup. I needed to make certain the SQL versions and reporting was completely patched but not necessarily updated. DPM is only happy with certain versions so do not upgrade SQL to the latest and greatest. Follow guidelines laid out on the Microsoft-DPM web sites.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Backup and Recovery Software
November 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Veeam Software, Veritas and others in Backup and Recovery Software. Updated: November 2022.
655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RamaswamyK - PeerSpot reviewer
M. I. S. Manager at Ruby Mills Ltd
Real User
Top 5
Good stability with an easy initial setup and capable of scaling
Pros and Cons
  • "The initial setup is quite straightforward."
  • "The user interface can be improved quite a bit."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution as a backup. We have some standalone and beta on it, however, we haven't got the whole stack on it now.

How has it helped my organization?

It has improved the organisation by taking care of disaster recovery.

What is most valuable?

The solution works well as a backup.

The initial setup is quite straightforward.

You can scale the solution easily.

The stability is very good.

What needs improvement?

The user interface can be improved quite a bit.

Overall, I wouldn't describe the solution as user-friendly. It's not very intuitive.

The issue is that for users who are not interacting with the product regularly, it becomes difficult to trace the various functionality available. The product version that we have does not have

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for almost a decade at this point. It's been about nine years. It's been a while.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable and reliable. It doesn't crash or break down. There aren't bugs or glitches. It works well.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution can scale if you need it to. That's not a problem at all.

We have about 200 users on the solution right now.

I'm unsure as to if we will increase usage in the future. That's not due to the nature of its scalability. Rather, we find it's not user-friendly enough.

How are customer service and technical support?

We've been satisfied with technical support so far. They are knowledgable and responsive. I have no complaints about their level of service.

How was the initial setup?

I wouldn't describe the initial setup as complex. It's pretty straightforward.

The deployment doesn't take too long. It takes about an hour in total to do everything you need to do.

What about the implementation team?

I handled the implementation myself. I didn't need the assistance of a consultant or integrator. It was handled in-house.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I bought the license for the solution from Microsoft as part of System Center. I'm not sure of the exact cost of the solution.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did test a couple of other different solutions before we ultimately chose DPM.

What other advice do I have?

We're just Microsoft customers. We don't have a business relationship with the company.

I believe that I am using the latest version of the solution. We got into later versions as we didn't use the beta version.

I wouldn't recommend this solution to others right now. It's not user-friendly enough. That level of annoyance with the product can really kill it.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. They used to give away this product and they stopped doing that. It would be nice if they returned to having it as a free solution. It would also be nice if they took some time to reconsider its design in order to make it more user-friendly in the future.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Rodney Carlson - PeerSpot reviewer
Rodney CarlsonSystem Analyst at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Real User

I agree with the assessment of DPM. Being a fellow user, I would include to keep an eye on the storage hardware solution. As it is used more, there are IO spikes and the storage needs to be able to accommodate this.

Managing Director at Adalites
Real User
Great features and functions flawlessly; integration with other products is not sufficient
Pros and Cons
  • "It has an application backup, a file backup, a system backup and a hypervisor."
  • "Compatibility and integration with other products needs improvement."

What is our primary use case?

My work is on the customer side. I analyze a company's situation and figure out what's best for them from a cost perspective and an installation perspective. I'm a customer of Microsoft and managing director of the company. 

What is most valuable?

I would definitely recommend data protection DPM. It has an application backup, a file backup, a system backup and a hypervisor. It works flawlessly, never a problem.

What needs improvement?

They could improve the compatibility and integration with other products and the ability to do file-to file backups of other products. I also find the hard disk aligning quite complicated and that should be simplified. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this solution for nine years. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of the solution is fine for Microsoft products, but there are issues when it comes to backing up other databases because I cannot take the file-to-file backup which creates some problems. 

How are customer service and technical support?

From the time you purchase the support they're there to help you. The price is good and that helps. There isn't a price match for DPM right now in the market.

How was the initial setup?

Deployment time depends on the user case; how many servers you have, etc. However, the basic installation can probably be done in two or three hours. Configuration depends on the products you're backing up, how many there are and the number of servers. I have my own team for deployment and I'm also Microsoft certified.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend Microsoft DPM as it is a cost-effective solution that works. It's worth checking the limitations of DPM before deployment, which can be done by reading the documentation. Make sure it's suitable for your needs and that it's going to work for you.

I would rate this solution a seven out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
DBA, Developer at a government with 201-500 employees
Real User
Good recovery functionality, however lacks an online community and is not a turn-key solution
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution backs up Microsoft workloads as well as anything on the market."
  • "There is a very poor online user community in terms of people blogging about their experiences with DPM."

What is our primary use case?

We're a local government entity and also a very Microsoft-centric shop. We use it for backing up the following workload types (All servers running Windows Server 20xx): 
- Physical Windows Servers
- Hyper-V Servers (at the host level)
- Hyper-V Servers ( at the guest level)
- Sharepoint
- Exchange 
- Network File Shares, implemented as CAFS (Continuously Available File Shares)

How has it helped my organization?

DPM has improved our RPO over the previous solution, which was dated and had been in place for years.

What is most valuable?

The solution really does great recovery. When the typical use case of someone says, "Oh gosh, I've accidentally deleted my file", we have that item-level recovery. It's saved us on many occasions. However, I do believe any backup solution would give a user that kind of performance.

The solution came with System Center so we didn't have to pay for it that way. If you're already a System Center customer, I believe it's a free product, or, at least, it comes with that bundle. That benefit there is you're already in the system set or ecosystem.

In that sense, the price is good since we're on System Center. 

The solution backs up Microsoft workloads just fine, when synchronization doesn't fail.

What needs improvement?

There is a very poor online user community in terms of people blogging about their experiences with DPM. 

I'm on Google all the time, resolving issues. All I ever find is the official Microsoft documentation. While that can be helpful, and that is in many cases, authoritative, it's not the same as having an independent user community who's writing about it. I have to wonder about the product when I don't see a vital external user community in existence.

Every day I have to log in and look at agent alerts and failures that I have to resolve. There are so many different types of agent failures that I have to diagnose pretty much every day due to the fact that the replicas are out of sync with the current state of a file or the VM or something. I'm constantly involved in a lot of hands-on maintenance. They need to change that and potentially make some sort of automated solution to this problem so the workload isn't so heavy for those maintaining the solution.

It's not a set it and forget it kind of solution. Not that anything is. However, it's a lot of labor involved in just keeping the replicas in sync.

One of the things I think would like to be able to use is their cloud storage at the block level so that it's cheaper for a government entity. We want to have replicas in the cloud, however, it's very expensive. They're using the most expensive tier of Azure storage. We would rather just be able to specify that our cloud backups go to Blob based storage for budgetary purposes. I don't believe that's available, but then again, I can't really find that out online due to a lack of a user community.

I would like to maybe have Office 365 backups. I know other vendors offer that however, I don't believe that's available within this solution.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for about three years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is average at best. I'm daily resolving anywhere from 20-80 synchronization failure, which occur for a variety of reasons.

The stability of the underlying system is questionable. There are many layers including the VSF service and the Windows server backup. There are agents. Then there's the DPM service as well. There are enough layers that having small problems from time to time means just constantly resolving replication issues. Stability, in terms of how well it keeps replicas in sync, is average.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I have not actually scaled this solution "out".  One server is backing up a population of 80 servers, most of them virtual, as well as Continuously Available File shares.

A secondary server is backing up our primary server, but that's secondary protection, not scaling per se.

I can say that you need to keep your total number of Data Sources to under 300 per server.  I did find this out only through a paid session with Microsoft Support.  This is a scalability metric, which would indicate you need to scale out.

I fixed the problem by reducing my data sources.  I did so by changing SQL Server protection to SQL backup jobs instead of using DPM Sql Server application protection.  SQL Server protection can explode your data source count, if you have a lot of databases to protect.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is lacking. You can't call Microsoft and enter a help ticket and have someone call you back. You also can't find a user community online.

Both of those avenues are things that almost anyone does with a new product of any complexity. Users are going to want vendor support or a user community supporting and I haven't found either to be available.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used an older version of VEEAM.  Our director was behind the adoption of DPM. We did so at his request.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup wasn't straightforward. There definitely was a learning curve. I would say it was complex.

Due to the steep learning curve, deployment probably took a few months. Once you understand things, you need to look into protection groups and items of that nature. 

I'm still learning new answers to the product. It's an ongoing learning process.

What about the implementation team?

I implemented this in-house.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Other than the SQL Server license, the cost factor is appealing.  There is a learning curve, like any other solution. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

My director was the one who advocated this choice. There was no competitor analysis, probably because the price of DPM was bundled into SCCM, for which we were already licensed.

What other advice do I have?

We're a government agency, so we don't have a business partnership with Microsoft.

I would suggest that Microsoft try to figure out how to foster an online user community outside of their official channels. This has been a source of frustration for me. New users should know, before implementing the solution, that this community doesn't exist right now, so there's no way to third-party verify Microsoft claims.

I would rate the solution five out of ten.

I would say it's not an industry leader. It might work for some people and it might be the most cost-effective option for some people, however, I don't know if everyone needs cloud backups. If a company needs a turn-key system or something close to turn-key system, it's not that.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
RamaswamyK - PeerSpot reviewer
M. I. S. Manager at Ruby Mills Ltd
Real User
Top 5
Has the ability to give a BMR for all the workstations or servers that I want to connect to
Pros and Cons
  • "Its capability to give a BMR for all the workstations that I want to connect to."
  • "The user friendliness could be improved."

How has it helped my organization?

I found Microsoft DPM pretty useful. It satisfied most of my requirements. We have a local tape drive as well, so we do an online backup of the exchange onto hard discs which later gets transferred to the tape drive. It seems to be fulfilling all the requirements, except I would say it's not very user-friendly.

What is most valuable?

One of its most valuable features is its capability to give a BMR for all the workstations that I want to connect to or to the servers, as well as the fact that it could do an online backup off the exchange.

What needs improvement?

I would say the user-friendliness could be improved because I have found that my colleagues are not finding it very easy to use. I have used it quite well. I was able to do a lot of features within it, but for a frustrated user, it becomes a little user-unfriendly. Also, one issue was if I wanted to restore mail - it's not feasible here.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been familiar with this solution for about six years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I had no problem with the stability - I could easily schedule it for the times I wanted the backups to take place.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I didn't have any issues with the scalability.

How are customer service and technical support?

I only contacted customer support once. It's a brilliant product. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. It took about an hour. I did it myself.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We bought the system center and we bought the DPM, as well, so I didn't need to upgrade the product at a later stage. I bought the SA for one year so it didn't cost much. I can't remember what I paid for the total licensing cost of that. Then, after one or two years we bought it on a three-year fee scenario and since then I have not had the need to buy any more SA solutions.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate Microsoft DPM an eight on a scale from1-10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Group Assistant, General Manager of IT at CIC
Real User
Backup and recovery that is stable but support is no longer in existence
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the recovery."
  • "We can't take a snapshot and take it outside, which is a problem."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case of this solution is for backup and recovery.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the recovery. The recovery of files on its own is no problem.

What needs improvement?

The DPM is pretty good, but when it comes to external devices, you can't back up to the external device. It's a huge drawback because once everything goes down, it goes down fully. We can't take a snapshot and take it outside, which is a problem.

Also, when it comes to recovery, the recovery process doesn't work properly. It doesn't recover. One of our drives failed and when we wanted to recover it from the other drive, it never worked. So, we couldn't recover the data.

Recovery of data if the server goes down, is not very good.

The DPM is good apart from the support services. We were told that the support was no longer in existence, which is why we are looking for another provider.

In the next release, I would like to see backup to external devices, so it can always restore the backup and we can take it externally and store it somewhere that it is off-site and archived. Currently, it does not allow us to do that because it is required to be in one location. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for almost six years.

We have the latest update.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This solution is stable, we have not had any issues and the DPM is good. When it came to updating the backup, we had some issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have 100 users, but in the old group, we had about 300.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support is good.

The only issue is that we didn't have the support services when it comes to our requirements. They said that the support is normal.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward. There is no complexity.

The deployment took about a day, to get the backup sorted out.

What about the implementation team?

We have our own team and the Microsoft team came to help us.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We wanted to use Veritas, but the support for our services was not available.

What other advice do I have?

Because of our budget constraints, we had some issues and wanted to go ahead with this DPM because it is a Microsoft product. We were told that this particular software is known and in operation worldwide, and when it comes to backups in existence it's listed in the October 2019 report.

My advice would be not to install DPM because of the support services.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
System Administrator with 51-200 employees
Real User
A solution with a good user interface that's stable and quick to set up

What is our primary use case?

I primarily use the solution for my documentation projects.

What is most valuable?

The user interface is very good. The reporting and monitoring features are also good.

What needs improvement?

The data tagging feature needs improvement. The solution could be a bit more intuitive in certain aspects. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. We've never had any issues.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is good. We're satisfied with the level of support we get.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very easy. Deployment takes less than an hour.

What about the implementation team?

We did use consultants to assist with some features.

What other advice do I have?

We use the on-premises deployment model.

Overall, I really like the product. There's not really any feature that is missing.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. it's very user-friendly, and I can do everything I need to do. It's very simple for me to use.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user175563 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems Administrator at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
Fast restores​ improved the business but a recent minor upgrade required a reboot of all of my protected 2008 servers

What is most valuable?

Ease of D2D and D2T backups.

How has it helped my organization?

Fast restores

What needs improvement?

In the areas of disaster recovery.

For how long have I used the solution?

2.5 years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

Recent minor upgrade required a reboot of all of my protected 2008 servers. This I considered unacceptable as I had to reschedule an outage window to reboot 100+ servers. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Yes, occasionally protection will stop working say for a simple system state backup.  

How are customer service and technical support?

Microsoft support for this product is very good. Open a web ticket and they will call you and still maintain the ticket as a web ticket

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Organization used BUExec but migrated to DPM because of Microsoft licensing and cost to maintain BUExec.

How was the initial setup?

Straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

In-house implementation.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Not given opportunity by management to evaluate additional products.

What other advice do I have?

Very good for Microsoft workloads. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Database Expert with 51-200 employees
Real User
Reliable, but serious issues.

Valuable Features:

Recovery.

Room for Improvement:

Yes: failure of primary; agent resource use.

Other Advice:

I'm afraid I fail to see how the CEO of a 500+ employee company can be a "real user" in any relevant sense. The real hands-on experience with DPM is that it's difficult to set up unless you get it right first time, the agent processes gobble CPU and i/o, and if you're unfortunate enough for your DPM primary to go awol, you're faced with building a complete DPM network again because the secondary/ies will refuse full backups if the primary isn't there.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user6414 - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Ultimate tool for great file system savings and fabric administration optimization

Valuable Features:

• Data Protection Manager enables fabric administrators to exercise flexibility and freedom in carrying out live migrations of VMs. As an administrator, it is easier now to handle migration of VMs from standalone to cluster, move them within standalones as well as within and across the cluster. • Offers a perfect solution to redundant data. Data Protection Manager assigns a link to the actual file that connects it to the common area where duplicated cold data is stored. I have found this to be a great saving on file system as file contents are maintained in common chunks.

Room for Improvement:

• Optimization of fabric administrator cause management problem to arise in backup administrator as it leads to the backup software failure in a manner that cannot be foreseen or anticipated finding backup administrators unawares. • In trying to solve the backup issue, Data Protection Manager involves complex connection of DPMs and VMM serves which may pose a challenge to beginners.

Other Advice:

Data Protection Manager provides data protection to your business system which covers every challenge posed by VMs migration. Through efficient use of DPMs or leveraging the situation by applying recovery techniques such as Item Level Recovery, data protection and recovery can be highly boasted. Leaning and understanding the file will enable one to master recovery techniques such as capability to recover directories and small file rather than the whole volume. This make the experience with Data Protection Manager a delight.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user156372 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user156372Database Expert with 51-200 employees
Real User

So no problems at all then Wissam?

See all 2 comments
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Backup and Recovery Software Report and find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Veeam Software, Veritas, and more!
Updated: November 2022
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Backup and Recovery Software Report and find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Veeam Software, Veritas, and more!